A Comparison of New Factor Models

Kewei Hou,Chen Xue,Lu Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2520929
2017-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:This paper compiles an extensive data library with 437 anomaly variables. Controlling for microcaps leads to 161 significant anomalies with NYSE breakpoints and value-weighted returns and 216 with all-but-micro breakpoints and equal-weighted returns. Liquidity is largely insignificant. The q-factor model has the lowest average magnitude of (and the lowest number of significant) high-minus-low alphas among all the models. The q-factor model outperforms a competing five-factor model in explaining momentum and profitability anomalies. Fundamentals, including investment and profitability, not liquidity, are the key driving forces of the broad cross section of average stock returns.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?