International Factor Models
Daniel Huber,Fabian Preissler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3533524
2020-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:We compare prominent factor models from Behavioral finance (Daniel, Hirshleifer, and Sun, 2019; Stambaugh and Yuan, 2016) and Neoclassical finance (Sharpe, 1964 and Lintner, 1965; Fama and French, 1993, 2015, 2018) on the four regions North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and Japan based on the maximum squared Sharpe ratio. Relying on the pairwise model comparison test introduced by Barillas et al. (2019), we find that the Daniel, Hirshleifer, and Sun (2019) three-factor model dominates all other models besides the Stambaugh and Yuan (2016) four-factor model in North America. In Europe, both the Daniel, Hirshleifer, and Sun (2019) and the Stambaugh and Yuan (2016) model dominate all other models, with no significant difference between them. In Asia Pacific, the Stambaugh and Yuan (2016) model dominates all other models besides the Daniel, Hirshleifer, and Sun (2019) model. In Japan, the Stambaugh and Yuan (2016) model has the highest in-sample maximum squared Sharpe ratio, but only the difference to the CAPM is significant. These results are supported by a multiple model comparison test and by means of a bootstrap simulation. Overall, it appears that the models from Behavioral finance are internationally very strong.