Abstract:This paper adopts minutely high-frequency data of yields,volumes and open interests of the six commodities futures in three exchanges of China to probe into their intraday change patterns,and discovers the `L' pattern intraday movement of absolute yield and volume.We exert financial market microstructure theory,traders' psychology and trading mechanism to explain the different intraday phenomenon between the futures market and the stock market,which has a distinctive `U' pattern.Basing on this,by the help of Granger causality test theories and Vector Autoregressive models(VAR),we study the factors that influence the volatility of yields and the lagged orders.The results show that there are two-way Granger causality among each two of the absolute yield,volume and open interest, which is different from the empirical result of the stock market that there is a one-way Granger causality from volume to absolute yield,and the difference comes from the short mechanism of futures market.Through the decomposition of variance of VAR models and the impulse response analysis,we empirically analyze the dynamic relationship among the three factors.The conclusion shows that: when we treat the volatility of absolute yield as an explained variable,the residual disturbance can be explained about 90% by its lagged terms,and volume can explain about 10%.When volume is interpreted as an explained variable,about 80% of the residual disturbance can be explained by its lagged terms and the volatility of the absolute price explains about 20%.When open interest is considered as an explained variable,lagged terms of its own interprets about 45% to 70% of the residual disturbance,the volume explains 25%-45%,and the volatility of absolute price explains 5% to 10%.All the explanatory variables reach stable about 20-30 minutes later.Empirical result tells the weak impact from open interest to volatility of absolute yield and volume and the strong correlation between volatility of absolute yield and volume.Some investment suggestions are offered from the analysis mentioned above.

Volatility Components: Evidence from VIX Futures Market

VIX Term Structure and VIX Futures Pricing with Realized Volatility

Pricing VIX Futures and Options With Good and Bad Volatility of Volatility

Variance Term Structure and VIX Futures Pricing

Prediction of Volatility Based on Realized-Garch-kernel-type Models: Evidence from China and the U.S.

Volatility Forecasting: the Role of Lunch-Break Returns, Overnight Returns, Trading Volume and Leverage Effects

Intraday Effects Analysis of Chinese Futures Markets

The Factor Structure of Realized Volatility and its Implications for Option Pricing

Pricing fixed income derivatives under a three-factor CIR model with unspanned stochastic volatility

A Markovian empirical model for the VIX index and the pricing of the corresponding derivatives

Modelling and Forecasting Volatility with High-Frequency and VIX Information: a Component Realized EGARCH Model with VIX

Research on relationships between volatility and returns, trading volume, open interest in Chinese futures market

Volatility of Chinese futures market based on ACD model

Analyses of Volatility Between Open Interest and Returns in China's Futures Market

Research on China Futures Market Price Duration Volatility Cluster Effect

High-Frequency Causality in the VIX Index and its derivatives: Empirical Evidence

The Variable Volatility Elasticity Model from Commodity Markets

Pricing the CBOE VIX Futures with the Heston–Nandi GARCH Model

Volatility of Volatility and VIX Forecasting: New Evidence Based on Jumps, the Short‐Term and Long‐Term Volatility

Asymmetric and high-order risk transmission across VIX and Chinese futures markets

Modeling the Implied Volatility Surface-: A Study for S&P 500 Index Option