Transition: contradictory but interacting processes of change in Dutch Agriculture

ploeg van der j d

2009-01-01

Abstract:Transition describes the shift from one form of equilibrium to another. This puts transition forces at the heart of social struggle. In this chapter we point out the fallacy that transitional processes are singular, linear and easily isolated. It is our contention that in Dutch agriculture today, three processes are present at the same time. They interact with each other and develop in different directions. These three processes can be globally labelled as the industrialisation of agriculture, the repeasantisation and, thirdly, the deactivation of the sector. We argue that these processes, although apparently controllable and under control, appear to have ramifications that are not understood by either scientists, politicians or the sector itself. We highlight the importance of the paradigm differences between novelties and innovation, as this helps to explain the differences between the processes of repeasantisation and industrialisation as they are illustrated by the InnovatieNetwork and the experience of a large territorial cooperative, the Northern Friesian Woodlands (NFW). We look at how the S-curve model for describing transition processes is used to explain the innovation process in the state-run programme InnovatieNetwork, and identify the dichotomy of interest which is implicit in an a government ` controlled' innovation process. This leads to observations about the efficacy of ` state' innovation programmes as opposed to those that are bottom-up initiatives (as in the NFW case), and the usefulness of the S-curve to illustrate these two phenomena.