Abstract:There is little disagreement among insurance actuaries and financial economists about the societal benefits of longevity-risk pooling in the form of life annuities, defined benefit pensions, self-annuitization funds, and even tontine schemes. Indeed, the discounted value or cost of providing an income for life is lower -- in other words, the amount of upfront capital required to generate a similar income stream with the same level of statistical safety is lower -- when participants pool their financial resources versus going it alone. Moreover, when participants' financial circumstances and lifespans are homogenous, there is consensus on how to share the "winnings" among survivors, namely by distributing them equally among survivors, a.k.a. a uniform rule. Alas, what is lesser-known and much more problematic is allocating the winnings in such a pool when participants differ in wealth (contributions) and health (longevity), especially when the pools are relatively small in size. The same problems arise when viewed from the dual perspective of decentralized risk sharing (DRS). The positive correlation between health and income and the fact that wealthier participants are likely to live longer is a growing concern among pension and retirement policymakers. With that motivation in mind, this paper offers a modelling framework for distributing longevity-risk pools' income and benefits (or tontine winnings) when participants are heterogeneous. Similar to the nascent literature on decentralized risk sharing, there are several equally plausible arrangements for sharing benefits (a.k.a. "skinning the cat") among survivors. Moreover, the selected rule depends on the extent of social cohesion within the longevity risk pool, ranging from solidarity and altruism to pure individualism. In sum, actuarial science cannot really offer or guarantee uniqueness, only a methodology.

Using Aumann-Shapley Values to Allocate Insurance Risk

Valuation of Information-Sharing in Marine Mutual Insurance

Portfolio risk allocation through Shapley value

Sharing Responsibility: What They Didn'T Teach You In Kindergarten

Risk Aggregation and Allocation in the Presence of Systematic Risk via Stable Laws

Risk sharing with Lambda value at risk under heterogeneous beliefs

Quantile-based risk sharing with heterogeneous beliefs

Some New Results on Allocation of Coverage Limits and Deductibles to Mutually Independent Risks

Risk Sharing with Lambda Value at Risk

Weighted Comonotonic Risk Sharing Under Heterogeneous Beliefs

Time-Consistent Asset Allocation for Risk Measures in a Lévy Market

Insurance Risk, Risk Measures, and Capital Allocation: Navigating A Copernican Shift

Scalar systemic risk measures and Aumann-Shapley allocations

SIZE-BIASED TRANSFORM AND CONDITIONAL MEAN RISK SHARING, WITH APPLICATION TO P2P INSURANCE AND TONTINES

Pricing and Capital Allocation for Multiline Insurance Firms With Finite Assets in an Imperfect Market

Probability weighting and insurance demand in a unified framework

P-Shapley: Shapley Values on Probabilistic Classifiers

Risk sharing under heterogeneous beliefs without convexity

'Egalitarian pooling and sharing of longevity risk', a.k.a. 'The many ways to skin a tontine cat'

Egalitarian pooling and sharing of longevity risk a.k.a. Can an administrator help skin the tontine cat?

Time-consistent mean-variance risk sharing and reinsurance for an insurance group in a Stackelberg differential game