Abstract:In risk-sharing markets with aggregate uncertainty, characterizing Pareto-optimal allocations when agents might not be risk averse is a challenging task, and the literature has only provided limited explicit results thus far. In particular, Pareto optima in such a setting may not necessarily be comonotonic, in contrast to the case of risk-averse agents. In fact, when market participants are risk-seeking, Pareto-optimal allocations are counter-monotonic. Counter-monotonicity of Pareto optima also arises in some situations for quantile-optimizing agents. In this paper, we provide a systematic study of efficient risk sharing in markets where allocations are constrained to be counter-monotonic. The preferences of the agents are modelled by a common distortion risk measure, or equivalently, by a common Yaari dual utility. We consider three different settings: risk-averse agents, risk-seeking agents, and those with an inverse S-shaped distortion function. In each case, we provide useful characterizations of optimal allocations, for both the counter-monotonic market and the unconstrained market. To illustrate our results, we consider an application to a portfolio choice problem for a portfolio manager tasked with managing the investments of a group of clients, with varying levels of risk aversion or risk seeking. We determine explicitly the optimal investment strategies in this case. Our results confirm the intuition that a manager investing on behalf of risk-seeking agents tends to invest more in risky assets than a manager acting on behalf of risk-averse agents.

Risk sharing under heterogeneous beliefs without convexity

Weighted Comonotonic Risk Sharing Under Heterogeneous Beliefs

Quantile-based risk sharing with heterogeneous beliefs

BILATERAL RISK SHARING WITH HETEROGENEOUS BELIEFS AND EXPOSURE CONSTRAINTS

Risk sharing with Lambda value at risk under heterogeneous beliefs

Counter-monotonic Risk Sharing with Heterogeneous Distortion Risk Measures

Optimal risk sharing under distorted probabilities

Optimal sharing, equilibria, and welfare without risk aversion

Counter-monotonic risk allocations and distortion risk measures

Sharing the value‐at‐risk under distributional ambiguity

Individual and Collective Welfare in Risk Sharing with Many States

Optimal Dynamic Risk Sharing under the Time‐consistent Mean‐variance Criterion

Risk Sharing with Multiple Indemnity Environments

Sharing the Value-at-Risk Under Distributional Ambiguity

Equilibrium in risk-sharing games

Risk Sharing with Lambda Value at Risk

Robust Optimal Risk Sharing and Risk Premia in Expanding Pools

On risk averse competitive equilibrium

Pareto-Optimal Peer-to-Peer Risk Sharing with Robust Distortion Risk Measures

Risk sharing for capital requirements with multidimensional security markets

Optimal Reinsurance Arrangement Under Heterogeneous Beliefs: A Unified Method with Piecewise Modification