Biomechanical analysis of a novel perfusional pedicle screw augmentation with bone cement in osteo-porotic vertebra

杨惠林,王志荣,王根林,朱若夫,吴树华,王以进,唐天驷
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2009.03.011
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective To clarify the biomechanical stability of novel perfusional pedicle screw (NPPS) in spinal vertebrae with osteoporosis. Methods Forty-two vertebrae (T<,11> to L<,5>) obtained from 6 for-malin preserved cadavers (5 males and 1 females; mean age, 73 years) were used. The mean bone mineral density was (0.696±0.14) g/cm2. The NPPS was inserted into one pediele of each vertebra, then early-dough-time cement 2 ml was perfused with the bone cement pusher and perfusion tube under X-ray into the verte-bra body through the hollow part of NPPS, and the control screw, an improved CD2 screw, was inserted into the contralateral pedicle. Three vertebrae were chose to observe the distribution of cement, and the other 39 vertebrae were randomly divided into three groups to make the pull-out test, rotating-out torque test, and cyclic bending resistance test respectively. Ten novel perfusional pedicle screws and ten control screws were respectively examined by three-point bend test. Results Cement perfused around the side holes of the distal screw in all vertebral body and no cement leakage occurred. The mean maximum force at pull-out was (760± 178) N for the NPPS and (355±87) N for the control screw. The mean maximum rotating-out torque was (1.347±0.377) N'm for the NPPS and (0.488±0.205) N'm for the control screw. In cyclic bending resistance test, the NPPS was found to withstand a greater number of cycles or greater loading before loosening. About 30.8% (4/13) of the NPPS became loosing (displacement>2.000 mm), the mean load of the loosening screws was (150±46) N and the mean displacement of the non-loosening screws was (0.661±0.289) mm. All of the control screws were loosening among 50-200 N before 800 cycles. Conclusion The manipulation of NPPS is simple with the application of cement pusher and perfusion tube. It is effective in the control of cement leakage and could enhance the fixation stability of the pedicel screw significantly in osteoporotic vertebrae. The remover of screw is easy with no destruction to vertebral body.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?