The decrease of E2 (serum estradiol) level at day four after ET (embryo transfer) means something in FTET (Frozen-thawed ET) cycles

chaoyuan yue,c fang,wei li,tang li,r huang,xiao liang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1102
IF: 6.7
2014-01-01
Fertility and Sterility
Abstract:To determine the chemical pregnancy rate(ChPR), clinical pregnancy rate(ClPR) and miscarriage rate within 12 weeks(MisR) of FTET (Frozen-thawed ET) cycles with or without E2 decrease at day 4 after ET. Retrospective study. A total of 2882 FTET cycles with E2 tested within 5 days before and after ET, among them 12.88%(156/1211) of natural cycles(NC) with an E2 decrease and almost half of the hormone replacement treatment(HRT) cycles(42.67%, 713/1671) with an E2 decrease. The ChPR, ClPR and MisR of the E2 increase group and E2 decrease group were analyzed, then multivariate logistic regressions were performed to determine the factors that influenced the outcomes. In NC cycles, the E2 decrease group had slightly less embryos transfer (1.81±0.68 vs. 1.94±0.66, p=0.030), decreased ChPR (48.08 vs. 59.34%, p=0.009), ClPR (34.44 vs. 51.07%, p<0.001), E2 at day 4 after ET (173.1(26.1-2047) vs. 327.0(67-2485), Mann-Whitney U test(U-test) p<0.001), E2 variation value(61.8(0.9-2031) vs. 134.4(1-2164), U-test p<0.001) as well as Progesterone level at day 4 after ET(P, 18.7(4.1-60) vs. 26.4(0-263.9), U-test p<0.001) differed significantly compared with E2 increase group. In HRT cycles, only the E2 at day 4 after ET (186.7(10-2556) vs. 257.7(47.2-6101), U-test p<0.001) and the E2 variation value (54.9(0.3-3044) vs. 71.1(0.1-2524.8), U-test p<0.001) were statistically different from the E2 increase group. Other factors including age, infertile years, BMI, basal FSH were not significantly different. When analyzed by multivariate logistic regression, factors influenced ChPR in NC cycles were age, embryo transfer numbers, embryo developmental stage and E2 increase group (OR (Odd Ration): 1.237, 95% CI (confidential interval): (1.065,1.437)), and factors influenced the ClPR are the same with a greater OR for E2 group(OR: 1.368, 95% CI: (1.171,1.597)). In HRT cycles, only the E2 level at day 4 after ET had a minor effect on the ChPR and ClPR (both OR was 1.000). The MisR was only influenced by age, basal FSH, BMI and embryo developmental stage. E2 decrease at day 4 after ET does not influence the clinical pregnancy and early stage miscarriage in HRT FTET cycles, but it indicates decreased clinical pregnancy rate in natural cycles. The P and variation of E2 level in FTET cycles would not affect the early pregnancy loss.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?