The relationship between blastocyst grade, time of blastocyst formation, maternal age and chromosomal aneuploidy

Y. Xie,M. Li,H. Park,S. Azadbadi,G. Hubert,A. Kumar,R. Buyalos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.593
IF: 6.7
2014-01-01
Fertility and Sterility
Abstract:To evaluate the correlation between blastocyst grade, time of blastocyst formation, maternal age and chromosomal aneuploidy. Retrospective analysis. 377 patients who underwent IVF at our center from Jan 2013 to Dec 2013 were included. A total of 1403 blastocysts underwent trophectoderm biopsy and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). The association of morphologic score, time of blastocyst formation, maternal age and the rate of aneuploidy were analyzed. Embryos that progressed to blastocysts on day5 were less likely to be aneuploid than day6 blastocysts (Table1 A). A surprisingly high percentage of grade AA blastocysts were aneuploid. More than half of the grade AB and BB blastocysts were aneuploid (Table 1B). The aneuploidy rate increased significantly with maternal age (Table 1C). Our data suggest a correlation between aneuploidy and the time of blastocyst formation, blastocyst quality and maternal age. A significant proportion of grade AA blastocysts were aneuploid suggesting morphologic analysis alone is insufficient to ensure transfer of normal embryos. Younger age groups had a high percentage of aneuploidy suggesting that PGS testing may be considered even in younger patients. Very few D6 blastocysts from patients >40 years were euploid. PGS-testing should be strongly considered in D6 embryos in this age group.Tabled 1THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN TIME OF BLASTOCYST FORMATION, EMBRYO GRADE, MATERNAL AGE AND RATE OF ANEUPLOIDYTable1 (A) Association between time of blastocyst formation and aneuploidyAneuploidy Rate (%)Age GroupsD5 BlastocystD6 Blastocystp valuedonor29 (n=217)38 (n=88)0.17<3524 (n=229)46 (n=128)0.00*35-3737 (n=139)53 (n=100)0.02*38-4055 (n=160)68 (n=124)0.04*41-4276 (n=80)84 (n=45)0.36>4276 (n=42)93 (n=51)0.04*Table1 (B) Association between embryo grade and aneuploidyAneuploidy Rate (%)p valueAAAB/BABBAA vs AB/BAAA vs BBAB/BA vs BBD5 Blastocyst31 (n=527)55 (n=197)58 (n=118)0.00*0.00*0.64D6 Blatocyst42 (n=177)58 (n=118)69 (n=224)0.120.00*0.04*Table1 (C) Association between maternal age and aneuploidyAge Groupsdonor<3535-3738-4041-42>42Aneuploidy Rate (%)323344617985p valuedonor vs <35 p=0.87; donor vs 35-37 p=0.00*; donor vs 38-40 p=0.00*; donor vs 41-42 p=0.00*; donor vs >42 p=0.00*; <35 vs 35-37 p=0.00*, <35 vs 38-40 p=0.00*; <35 vs 41-42 p=0.00*; <35 vs >42 p=0.00*; 35-37 vs 38-40 p=0.00*; 35-37 vs 41-42 p=0.00*; 35-37 vs >42 p=0.00*; 38-40 vs 41-42 p=0.00*; 38-40 vs >42 p=0.00*; 41-42 vs >42 p=0.29* p<0.05 statistical significant difference Open table in a new tab
What problem does this paper attempt to address?