Complementary Food Choices from 6–18 Mo: Effect on Iron (fe) Status and Inflammation

Xiao-Yang Sheng,Jing-Qiu Ma,Jin-Rong Liu,Yan-Qi Hu,Shan-Shan Liu,Jie Zhang,Jamie Westcott,Michael Hambidge,Nancy F. Krebs
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.26.1_supplement.1031.1
2012-01-01
Abstract:ObjectiveTo compare Fe status in rural poor 18 mo old toddlers fed 3 different complementary foods.MethodsThe study was a cross‐sectional convenience sub‐sample of a larger study in which 6 mo old infants were randomized to receive 50g/d pork (MG, n=137), an equi‐caloric micronutrient fortified cereal‐based supplement (FG,140) or local non‐fortified rice supplement (LG, 133) for 1 yr. Hb, sTfR, HsCRP, ferritin, AGP were measured in serum; calprotectin (FCP) was measured in feces. Body Fe =‐log (sTfR) × 1000/ferritin)‐2.8229]/0.1207. Fe deficiency=ferritin<12μg/L.ResultsMean (± SD) Hb, MCV, MCHC, sTfR, ferritin did not differ among groups. Significant differences were: Parameter MG FG LG P‐value Body Fe, mg/kg1 6.6 ± 3.1 7.6 ± 2.6 6.3 ± 3.4 <0.01 Fe deficiency, n (%)1 40 (34%) 26 (25%) 46 (41%) 0.03 AGP, g/L, (n) 0.75±0.21(37) 0.98±0.33(39) 0.83±0.35(31) <0.01 FCP, μg/g, (n) 200±214(37) 413±491(39) 192±197(31) <0.001 Excluded subjects with Hs‐CRP>3mg/L ConclusionMicronutrient fortified cereal improved Fe status but was also associated with systemic and intestinal inflammation. Supported by Thrasher Research Fund; Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children's Environmental Health.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?