Evaluation of Flag Leaf Chlorophyll Content Index in 30 Spring Wheat Genotypes under Three Irrigation Regimes.

Ping Li,Wu Pute,Jianli Chen
2012-01-01
Australian Journal of Crop Science
Abstract:The chlorophyll content in flag leaves reflects photosynthetic activity and yield potential of wheat plants. A two-year field experiment was carried out to evaluate flag leaf chlorophyll content index (CCI) at different growth stages [Feekes 10.5.2 (anthesis), Feekes 11.1 (kernels milky ripe, GF-1), and Feekes 11.2 (kernels mealy ripe, GF-2)] and irrigation regimes [non-irrigated, 50%- evapotranspiration (ET) irrigated, and 100%-ET irrigated] in 30 spring wheat genotypes. The CCI of four groups with different yield performances across irrigation regimes: high-yield genotype (HYG), low-yield genotype (LYG), drought-resistant genotype (DRG) and drought-susceptible genotype (DSG), were compared. Maximum flag leaf CCI was recorded at GF-1 stage for most genotypes under all irrigation regimes. Severe drought stress decreased CCI value while both severe and moderate drought stress accelerated the CCI loss after GF-1 stage. No correlation between CCI and grain yield was found, but CCI decrease (CCID) and grain yield was negatively correlated (P < 0.05), especially for the well-watered condition. Compared with the other groups, DRG had much higher CCI, especially CCI evaluated at anthesis under well-watered condition; the CCI of HYG declined either later or slower after GF-1 stage. Results from this study suggest that GF-1 stage may be the optimum time for evaluating flag leaf CCI; the CCID from GF-1 to GF-2 rather than the CCI value could be used as an index to predict grain yield; the CCI value may be considered as an indicator for screening drought resistant genotypes in wheat breeding programs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?