Microstructures and liquidus projection of the ternary Ag–Sb–Te system
Hsin-jay Wu,Sinn-wen Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.09.200
IF: 6.2
2011-01-01
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
Abstract:Ag–Sb–Te alloys are important for thermoelectric applications. Fifty-one Ag–Sb–Te ternary alloys were prepared, and their primary solidification phases were analyzed. The liquidus troughs of the liquidus projection of the ternary Ag–Sb–Te system are determined based on the experimental results and the phase diagrams of the three binary constituent systems. There are 13 primary solidification phase regions. In addition to the three terminal solid solution phases and nine binary compounds, there is one ternary compound, AgSbTe 2 . A unique microstructure with bright spherical phases uniformly dispersed in a matrix caused by a miscibility gap in the liquid phase is found in the γ-Ag 2 Te primary solidification phase regime. A very fine microstructure with nanometer size Ag 2 Te is also observed, resulting from the class I reaction, liquid = δ + Ag 2 Te + AgSbTe 2 , at 496.5 °C, and the liquid composition of Ag–40.0 at%Sb–36.0 at%Te. Keywords Solidification Microstructure Thermoelectric materials 1 Introduction Thermoelectric materials have been intensively investigated recently due to their small size and direct electric–thermal energy conversion in applications [1–7] . As one of the most promising thermoelectric materials [6] , AgSbTe 2 compound is an important component of many promising thermoelectric materials, such as AgPb m SbTe 2 m [3,4] and TAGS-x alloy [7,8] . TAGS-x stands for AgSbTe 2(1− x ) GeTe x whose figure-of-merit value ZT is 1.4 at 750 K when x is 85, and 1.7 at 700 K when x is 80. The ZT of the AgPb m SbTe 2 m bulk thermoelectric material is as high as 2.2 at 800 K when m is 10 [3] . The ZT = ( S 2 σ / κ ) T is the most critical property of thermoelectric materials where S is the Seebeck coefficient, σ is the electrical conductivity and κ is the thermal conductivity [1–6] . Although very promising ZT values have been found in Ag–Sb–Te and Ag–Sb–Te-based materials, complicated domains affecting the efficiency of their bulk properties have been reported [9] . Results from previous studies clearly indicate that the thermoelectric properties are strongly influenced by the existing phases and microstructures [10–12] , but fundamental understanding of the phase and microstructure formation is lacking. Liquidus projection is the projection of the liquidus troughs of a space phase diagram [13–15] , and it is an important type of fundamental material information. Liquidus projection depicts the compositional ranges of different primary solidification phases, the first solidification phases, and it is very useful in the understanding of phase formation during solidification. This study carries out experimental determination of the liquidus projection of the ternary Ag–Sb–Te system. Various Ag–Sb–Te alloys are prepared. The phase transformation temperatures are determined using DTA (differential thermal analysis). The primary solidification phases of the as-solidified Ag–Sb–Te alloys are metallographically examined. Based on the phase relationships of the constituent binary systems [16–18] , the information of the primary solidification phases and thermal analysis results, the Ag–Sb–Te liquidus projection is then constructed. This fundamental information is useful for analyzing the microstructural development and phase formation, and is essential for designing and understanding the Ag–Sb–Te thermoelectric materials. 2 Experimental procedures Ternary Ag–Sb–Te alloys were prepared with pure Ag shots (99.99 wt%, Aldrich, USA), Sb pellets (99.999 wt%, Sigma–Aldrich, USA), and Te pellets (99.99 wt%, Aldrich, Saint Louis, USA). Proper amounts of constituent elements were weighed and encapsulated in quartz tubes at a pressure of 10 −5 bar. The total mass of one ingot is about 1 g. The sample capsule was first placed in a furnace at 800 °C for 4 h, and 1000 °C for another 4 h for the alloys at the Ag-rich corner, to ensure complete mixing of the constituent elements. The capsule was then quenched in water. The quenched alloys were cut into parts. One part was metallographically examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi, S-2500, Japan), and the phase compositions were determined by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and field-emission electron-probe microanalysis (FE-EPMA, JEOL, JXA-8500F, Japan). The phase transformation temperatures were determined by DTA (Perkin Elmer DTA7, USA) with 4 °C/min heating and cooling rates. Powder X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD, Scintac, XDS-2000 V/H, USA) with Cu-Ka as the radiation source was also conducted for phase determination. 3 Results and discussions Fifty-one Ag–Sb–Te alloys were prepared. Their nominal compositions were calculated based on the mass measurements of the constituent elements used for the sample preparation, and are summarized in Table 1 and shown in Fig. 1 (a) . Since liquidus trough projection delineates the compositional regimes of primary solidification phases, the boundaries of Ag–Sb–Te liquidus projection are determined from the results of the primary solidification phases which are identified through the as-quenched alloys and the phase diagrams of the three constituent binary systems [16–18] . The temperature descending direction of the liquidus trough lines are determined from the thermal analysis results. The liquidus projection of Ag–Sb–Te has thus been determined as shown in Fig. 1 (a) and (b). The metallographic and thermal analysis results are illustrated below. 3.1 Primary phase: Te Fig. 2 (a) is the backscattering electron image (BEI) of alloy#1 (Ag–5.0 at%Sb–70.0 at%Te). Three different phase regions are observed, including the bright dendritic phase, the dark phase formed along the isles of the dendrites and a eutectic microstructure region. Based on the microstructure [19,20] , it is concluded that the bright dendritic phase is the primary solidification phase. Its composition is 99.0 at%Te, as determined by EDS, and it is a Te phase with very small Ag and Sb solubilities. Similar results are found for the alloy#2 (Ag–10.0 at%Sb–70.0 at%Te), with the Te phase is its primary solidification phase as well. In addition to the primary solidification phase, the other phase regions of alloy#1 are also examined. As shown in Fig. 1 (a), the solidification path moves away from the Te corner with the precipitation of the Te phase, which intercepts the liquidus trough line, i.e. the Te/Ag 5 Te 3 univariant line. The average composition of the fine-microstructure region is Ag–5.0 at%Sb–64.6 at%Te. It is likely the last solidified region, and it goes through the class I reaction, liquid = Te + Sb 2 Te 3 + Ag 5 Te 3 . The XRD results, as shown Fig. 2 (b), are consistent with the microstructural analysis. 3.2 Primary phase: Sb 2 Te 3 Fig. 3 (a) is the BEI micrograph of as-cast alloy#3 (Ag–20.0 at%Sb–70.0 at%Te). The gray dendritic phase is the primary solidification phase. Its composition is Ag–39.8 at%Sb–58.8 at%Te and it is a Sb 2 Te 3 phase with l.5 at%Ag solubility. Similar results are found for alloys#4–#8 for which Sb 2 Te 3 is also the primary solidification phase. The composition of the bright phase adjacent to the dendritic phase is Sb–96.7 at%Te and is in the Te phase with negligible Ag. As shown in the liquidus projection of Fig. 1 (a), the solidification path moves toward the Sb 2 Te 3 /Te univariant line with the precipitation of the Sb 2 Te 3 phase and the Te phase is the secondary solidification phase. Fig. 3 (b) is the X-ray diffraction pattern for alloy#3, which clearly illustrates the three solidified phases. Fig. 3 (c) is the BEI micrograph of alloy#5 (Ag–20.0 at%Sb–60.0 at%Te). As mentioned previously, similar to the alloy#3, its primary solidification phase is the Sb 2 Te 3 phase. However, the secondary phase is not the bright Te phase as in as-cast alloy#3. A darker phase is formed adjacent to the Sb 2 Te 3 phase and between the dendrites. Its composition is Ag–32.7 at%Sb–49.9 at%Te and it is an AgSbTe 2 phase. As shown in Fig. 1 (a), due to the differences of their nominal compositions, the solidification path of alloy#5 moves toward the Sb 2 Te 3 /AgSbTe 2 univariant line instead of the Sb 2 Te 3 /Te, as in the case of alloy#3. In addition to these phases, regions with fine structures can also be observed in Fig. 3 (a) and (c). 3.3 Primary phase: γ Fig. 4 is the BEI micrograph of as-cast alloy#9 (Ag–40.0 at%Sb–50.0 at%Te). The composition of the dendritic phase is Ag–41.4 at%Sb–52.3 at%Te, and it is a γ phase with a small amount of Ag solubility. In addition to the primary solidification γ phase, significant amounts of the AgSbTe 2 phase and δ phase are observed in as-cast alloy#9. The results clearly indicate that the temperature descending direction of the γ/AgSbTe 2 and δ/AgSbTe 2 univariant lines move from the Te corner toward the Ag–Sb side, and the AgSbTe 2 phase and δ phase solidify after the solidification of the Sb 2 Te 3 phase. 3.4 Primary phase: δ Fig. 5 (a) is the BEI of as-cast alloy#14 (Ag–60.0 at%Sb–30.0 at%Te). The average composition of the primary solidification phase is Ag–62.9 at%Sb–32.6 at%Te, which is in the δ phase with 4.6% solubility of Ag. In addition to the δ phase, the Ag 2 Te phase and regions of eutectic structure are observed. With the precipitation of the δ phase, the residual liquid moves toward the δ/Ag 2 Te univariant line. The average composition of the fine structure region is Ag–44.0 at%Sb–36.0 at%Te, which is likely the last solidified region through the liquid = δ + Ag 2 Te + AgSbTe 2 class I reaction. Similar results are found for alloys#10–#13, and the primary solidification phase is the δ phase. Fig. 5 (b) is the BEI for as-cast alloy#13 (Ag–55.0 at%Sb–40.0 at%Te). Although the primary phase is also the δ phase, the rest of the liquid moves toward the δ/AgSbTe 2 univariant line and the ternary AgSbTe 2 is solidified as second phase. 3.5 Primary phase: Sb Fig. 6 (a) is the BEI micrograph of alloy#15 (Ag–50.0 at%Sb–25.0 at%Te). The dendritic phase is the primary solidification phase. Its composition is Ag–99.3 at%Sb, and it is a Sb phase with very small amounts of Ag and Te solubilities. Similar results are found for alloy#16 and #17, as shown in Fig. 6 (b) and (c), and all the primary solidification phase is the Sb phase. In addition to the Sb phase, the Ag 2 Te phase with a composition of Ag–1.4 at%Sb–33.3 at%Te can be observed in Fig. 6 (a)–(c). For all three alloys, the Ag 2 Te phase is the secondary solidification phase. The δ phase is also found in the as-cast alloys. The existence of the δ phase indicates that the descending direction of the temperature of the Sb/γ-Ag 2 Te univariant line moves toward the δ phase direction. 3.6 Primary phase: ɛ, ξ, and Ag Fig. 7 (a) is the BEI micrograph of as-cast alloy#18 (Ag–3.0 at%Sb–7.0 at%Te). The dark dendritic phase is the primary phase and it is an Ag phase with a composition of 97.3 at%Ag. The rest of the matrix is primarily the secondary solidification phase, Ag 2 Te. The results suggest that with the precipitation of the Ag phase, the liquid phase moves toward the Ag/γ-Ag 2 Te univariant line. Fig. 7 (b) is the BEI micrograph of as-cast alloy#19 (Ag–5.0 at%Sb–5.0 at%Te). Similar to that of alloy#18, the primary solidification phase is also the dendritic Ag phase. However, the secondary phase surrounding the Ag phase is the gray ξ phase. Different from that of alloy#18, the liquid phase moves toward the Ag/ξ univariant line with the solidification of the Ag phase. Fig. 7 (c) is the BEI micrograph of as-cast alloy#20 (Ag–10.0 at%Sb–5.0 at%Te). The results are similar to those of alloy#19. The primary phase is the dendritic Ag phase, and the secondary phase is the ξ phase. Compared to that of alloy#19, alloy#20 has a larger amount of the ξ phase. According to the binary Ag–Sb diagram [17] , there are four different primary solidification phases, i.e. Sb, ɛ, ξ, and Ag, along the Ag–Sb side. Alloy#31 (Ag–30.0 at%Sb–5.0 at%Te) was initially presumed to be in the primary ɛ phase region but the microstructural examination results show that it is in the γ-Ag 2 Te phase region. This result will be discussed later. This suggests that the liquidus trough of γ-Ag 2 Te/ɛ is close to the Ag–Sb side, as shown in Fig. 1 (a) and (b). 3.7 Primary phase: γ-Ag 2 Te, ß-Ag 2 Te Fig. 8 (a) is the BEI micrograph of alloy#25 (Ag–40.0 at%Sb–30.0 at%Te). Three different phase regions are observed, including the dendritic phase, the brighter phase adjacent to the dendritic phase, and a fine microstructure region. The dendritic phase is the primary solidification phase. Its composition is Ag–1.9 at%Sb–33.8 at%Te, and it is an Ag 2 Te phase. The composition of the brighter phase is Ag–53.8 at%Sb–34.9 at%Te, and it is a δ phase with the 11.4 at% solubility of Ag. Similar results are observed for alloy#27 (Ag–50.0 at%Sb–30.0 at%Te). The primary solidification phase is the dendritic Ag 2 Te phase, and the secondary phase is the δ phase. Fig. 8 (b) is the BEI micrograph of alloy#32 (Ag–10.0 at%Sb–35.0 at%Te). Although the primary solidification phase is Ag 2 Te phase as well, different from alloy#25, the secondary solidification phase is AgSbTe 2 [6,9] with the average composition of Ag–30.0 at%Sb–50.0 at%Te. In addition to the Ag 2 Te and AgSbTe 2 phases, a fine microstructure region is also observed. Similar results are found for alloy#21 (Ag–30.0 at%Sb–40.0 at%Te), alloy#23 (Ag–35.0 at%Sb–38.0 at%Te) and alloy#28 (Ag–20.0 at%Sb–40.0 at%Te). Fig. 8 (c) is the BEI micrograph of alloy#29 (Ag–20.0 at%Sb–35.0 at%Te). Except for the primary solidification Ag 2 Te phase, only a fine microstructure region is observed. Similar results are found for alloy#22 (Ag–30.0 at%Sb–36.0 at%Te). It is likely that the solidification paths of alloy#29 and #22 move directly toward the class I reaction, liquid = δ + Ag 2 Te + AgSbTe 2 , with almost no interception of the univariant lines. Thus, only the primary solidification phase and a fine microstructural region are observed. Fig. 8 (d) is the BEI micrograph for as-cast alloy#30 (Ag–20.0 at%Sb–20.0 at%Te). Large quantities of bright phase are observed, which represent Ag 2 Te phase with small Sb solubility. The Sb phase is adjacent to the primary Ag 2 Te, which indicates the liquid moves toward the γ-Ag 2 Te/Sb univariant line. The ɛ and the eutectic region in the matrix confirm that the solidification direction moves toward the Ag–Sb side and finally ends in the ternary or at the binary eutectic point. Fig. 8 (e) shows the BEI micrographs for as-cast alloy#31 (Ag–30.0 at%Sb–5.0 at%Te), and the microstructure is similar with alloy#30, except that the primary Ag 2 Te is relatively small in amount and great quantities of ɛ phase are formed as the secondary phase. Fig. 9 (a) is the BEI micrograph of alloy#33 (Ag–13.0 at%Sb–12.0 at%Te). An interesting microstructure is observed and the bright spherical phases are uniformly dispersed in the matrix. The microstructure indicates the existence of a liquid miscibility gap which extends from the Ag–Te binary edge [16,21,22] . An enlarged liquidus projection at the Ag-rich corner is shown in Fig. 10 . Alloy#33 was inside the miscibility gap at 1000 °C, and there were two liquids, L 1 and L 2 . During the cooling process, the relatively Ag-rich L 1 phase region moves toward the primary ξ regime, while the relatively Te-rich L 2 phase moves toward the primary Ag 2 Te regime. It should be mentioned that the critical point of the liquidus miscibility gap is drawn without experimental proof and needs to be verified in a future study. Fig. 9 (b) and (c) are the BEI micrographs of alloy#34 (Ag–5.0 at%Sb–25.0 at%Te) with smaller and larger magnification rates. The nominal composition of alloy#34 is close to the boundary of the miscibility dome. A larger amount of bright phase which solidified from L 2 is surrounded by darker phase. The average composition of the bright phase is Ag–5.7 at%Sb–27.1 at%Te, similar to that in the as-solidified L 2 in alloy#33. The dark phases are composed of the ξ and ɛ phases with compositions of Ag–16.2 at%Sb and Ag–21.0 at%Sb, respectively. Both of the two Ag–Sb compounds contain negligible Te-solubility. Similar results can be found in the as-solidified alloy#35 (Ag–8.0 at%Sb–15.0 at%Te), and alloy#36 (Ag–5.0 at%Sb–13.0 at%Te), as shown in Fig. 9 (d) and (e), respectively. Fig. 11 (a) and (b) are the BEI micrographs of alloy#37 (Ag–5.0 at%Sb–45.0 at%Te) and alloy#38 (Ag–3.0 at%Sb–45.0 at%Te). The darker dendritic phase is the primary phase and the compositional analysis results indicate they are in the Ag 2 Te phase. According to the binary Ag–Te phase diagram [16] , the γ-Ag 2 Te transforms to ß-Ag 2 Te at lower temperatures, and alloy#37 and #38 are close to the ß-Ag 2 Te primary phase region. However, no distinction could be made in this study between the γ-Ag 2 Te and ß-Ag 2 Te. A dashed line is drawn arbitrarily between the γ-Ag 2 Te/ß-Ag 2 Te as a reminder of the possible existence of this boundary without proof. Small amounts of the ternary AgSbTe 2 phase are also found in as-solidified alloy#37 and #38, and the fine structure region is a mixture phase region. 3.8 Primary phase: ß-Ag 1.9 Te and ß-Ag 5 Te 3 Fig. 12 (a) is the BEI micrograph of alloy#39 (Ag–5.0 at%Sb–52.0 at%Te). The micrograph on the upper-left corner is a micrograph with a smaller magnification rate. There are at least three different phase regions, the relatively large twig-like phase, a dark phase adjacent to the twig-like phase, and a multi-phase mixture region. Based on the microstructure, the twig-like phase is the primary solidification phase. Its composition is Ag–1.7 at%Sb–38.1 at%Te, and it is a ß-Ag 5 Te 3 phase with 1.7 at% solubility of Sb. According to the binary Ag–Te phase diagram [16] , there are two different primary solidification phases around this compositional regime, ß-Ag 1.9 Te and ß-Ag 5 Te 3 . It should be mentioned that these two phases are very similar and no distinction between them could be made in this study. Moreover the ß-Ag 5 Te 3 phase identified here could be the ß-Ag 1.9 Te phase. The composition of the darker and smaller phase adjacent to the ß-Ag 5 Te 3 phase is Ag–30.1 at%Sb–48.8 at%Te, and it is a ternary AgSbTe 2 phase. As shown in Fig. 1 (b), the liquid composition moves toward the ß-Ag 5 Te 3 + AgSbTe 2 univariant line with the precipitation of the ß-Ag 5 Te 3 phase, and the AgSbTe 2 phase is the secondary solidification phase. The illustration is in agreement with the observation that the AgSbTe 2 phase is adjacent to the primary ß-Ag 5 Te 3 phase. The majority of this sample is a multi-phase mixture region. It is likely the final solidification part occurs through the class I reaction, liquid = ß-Ag 5 Te 3 + AgSbTe 2 + Te. Similar results are observed for alloy#40 (Ag–5.0 at%Sb–56.0 at%Te) and #41 (Ag–5.0 at%Sb–60.0 at%Te) as shown in Fig. 12 (b) and (c), respectively. Since this study does not differentiate the ß-Ag 1.9 Te and ß-Ag 5 Te 3 phases, the ß-Ag 1.9 Te/ß-Ag 5 Te 3 univariant line is drawn as a dashed line. 3.9 Primary phase: AgSbTe 2 Fig. 13 (a) is the BEI micrograph of as-cast alloy#44 (Ag–10.0 at%Sb–52.0 at%Te). The composition of the dendritic phase is Ag–20.6 at%Sb–50.4 at%Te and it is a ternary AgSbTe 2 phase. This has been reported in previous studies and it considered as a remarkable thermoelectric material [6–9] . A brighter phase is formed adjacent to the AgSbTe 2 phase. Its composition is Ag–3.0 at%Sb–37.5 at%Te and it is ß-Ag 5 Te 3 phase. Similar results are found for as-cast alloy#42 (Ag–10.0 at%Sb–60.0 at%Te), alloy#47 (Ag–20.0 at%Sb–52.0 at%Te), alloy#48 (Ag–20.0 at%Sb–45.0 at%Te), alloy#49 (Ag–30.0 at%Sb–50.0 at%Te), alloy#50 (Ag–35.0 at%Sb–45.0 at%Te), alloy#51 (Ag–40.0 at%Sb–40.0 at%Te), and the primary phase of all of the above alloys is ternary AgSbTe 2 . Fig. 13 (b) is the BEI micrograph of alloy#45 (Ag–10.0 at%Sb–45.0 at%Te). In addition to the primary AgSbTe 2 phase, the eutectic type lamellar microstructures of AgSbTe 2 and Ag 2 Te are observed. It has been proposed that there is a pseudo binary eutectic reaction, L = AgSbTe 2 + Ag 2 Te [6] , at 70 at%Ag 2 Te in the Ag 2 Te–Sb 2 Te 3 system at 544 °C. Based on the metallographic observation, it is very likely that the lamellar structure of alloy#45 was formed through this eutectic reaction. To further confirm the existence of this pseudo binary eutectic reaction, alloy#46 was prepared with this eutectic composition (Ag–15.0 at%Sb–45.0 at%Te). Fig. 13 (c) is the BEI micrograph of the as-cast alloy#46 (Ag–15.0 at%Sb–45.0 at%Te). Similar to the microstructure of alloy#44, a lamellar structure of AgSbTe 2 and Ag 2 Te is formed. The brighter phase is confirmed to be Ag 2 Te and the darker phase is AgSbTe 2 . It has been reported that the microstructures are very important to the thermoelectric properties [10–12] . Self-assembled nanometer lamellae of PbTe and Sb 2 Te 3 was prepared using the rapid solidification method [23] , and it was found that the thermoelectric properties were improved with randomly distributed phases with feature sizes in nanometer to sub-micrometer. As shown in Fig. 13 (b) and (c), a lamellar structure of AgSbTe 2 and Ag 2 Te phases was produced with normal quenching. The orientation of the lamellae seems randomly distributed in different grains. The spacing of lamellae, less than 1 μm, is quite uniform. Fig. 13 (d) is the BEI micrograph of alloy#51 (Ag–40.0 at%Sb–40.0 at%Te). In addition to the primary AgSbTe 2 solidification phase, there are regions with very fine microstructures. The sizes of the tiny bright particulates in the fine structure region are around 200–400 nm, and it is difficult to determine the composition quantitatively. According to the liquidus projection, the fine microstructure region is the final solidified ternary eutectic. Fine microstructure regions have been observed and mentioned previously various alloys, such as alloys#10–#13, #21–#23 and #25–#27, etc. 3.10 Class I, liquid = δ + Ag 2 Te + AgSbTe 2 Fig. 14 (a) and (b) are the BEI micrographs of alloy#24 (Ag–40.0 at%Sb–36.0 at%Te). Very fine microstructure is observed. The average composition of the fine microstructure region is homogenous. No primary solidification phase can be observed, as shown in Fig. 14 (a), which shows a lower magnification rate. The XRD results show three phases, AgSbTe 2 , Ag 2 Te and δ, as shown in Fig. 14 (c). The results are in agreement with the proposed liquidus projection which determined that alloy#24 is at class I reaction composition. A closer look of the microstructure in larger magnification, as shown in Fig. 14 (b), reveals that the white precipitates are in sub-micrometer size and are aligned in specific directions in different grains. The size of the bright phase is about 200–400 nm, as shown Fig. 14 (d), which shows the secondary electron image (SEI) of the specimen taken from the quenched alloy#24 by using the focused ion beam (FIB) technique. Color-mapping technique is carried out by field-emission EPMA with a magnification of 6000×, and the results are shown in Fig. 14 (e). The bright particulate is in the Ag-rich phase, which is the Ag 2 Te phase. Fig. 13 (d) is the BEI micrograph of alloy#51 solidified after air-cooling. In addition to the AgSbTe 2 and δ phases, regions of fine microstructure with the bright Ag 2 Te phase are observed. Alloy#51 is compositionally near the AgSbTe 2 /δ univariant line. After the solidification of the primary AgSbTe 2 and the secondary δ phase, the residual liquid then passes through the class I reaction point and forms fine microstructure in the matrix. It is worth of mentioning that the materials with fine and uniform microstructure are less brittle, which is a common problem of Te-bearing materials. Furthermore, thermoelectric alloys with sub-micrometer sized microstructure are reported with exceptionally excellent thermoelectric efficiency [10–12,23] . Alloy#24 is likely a good candidate to be a good thermoelectric material; this alloy could easily be prepared simply through water-quenching of the melt. 3.11 Thermal analysis results The phase transformation temperatures are determined by thermal analysis. Since superheating effect is usually not as significant [24–27] , the temperatures reported in this study are thus determined from the heating curves of DTA. The determinations of temperatures from the heating curves are based on the theory described previously [24–27] . It should be noted that the DTA heating and cooling curves shown in Fig. 15 (a)–(c) are based on raw data without calibration. A calibration curve is constructed based on the DTA results of pure Sn, In, Zn, Pb and Sb. The phase transformation temperatures reported in the text for alloys#1, #11, #24, #30, #37, #47, #49 and #51 are all calibrated results. These results are summarized in Table 2 . Fig. 15 (a) shows the DTA heating and cooling curves of alloy#24 (Ag–40.0 at%Sb–36.0 at%Te). Based on the metallographic observation, the alloy is at the ternary eutectic point. Only one reaction peak can be found in the DTA heating curve of alloy#24, at 496.5 °C. This is in agreement with the proposed class I reaction: liquid = δ + Ag 2 Te + AgSbTe 2 . It is worthy of mentioning that the difference between the onset temperatures of the cooling and heating curves as shown in Fig. 15 (a) is small, and it is an indication that the undercooling is not significant for the solidification of this alloy. In some situations and some alloys, undercooling is large and it could change the solidified microstructures and even alter the sequence of solidification phases [28] . The undercooling effect thus brings experimental uncertainties in the determination of primary solidification phase, and could possibly be the reason for the dash lines as shown in Fig. 1 (a) and (b). Fig. 15 (b) is the DTA heating and cooling curve of alloy#1 (Ag–5.0 at%Sb–70.0 at%Te). Three reaction peaks are observed. The peak with the lowest temperature, at 323.9 °C, results from the class I reaction: L = β-Ag 5 Te 3 + AgSbTe 2 + Te. The second peak, at 380.4 °C, is from the L = Te + β-Ag 5 Te 3 univariant reaction. The peak at 408.7 °C is relatively small and broad and is the liquidus temperature. The thermal analysis results are consistent with the metallographic observation mentioned above. Fig. 15 (c) is the DTA heating and cooling curve for alloy#49 (Ag–30.0 at%Sb–50.0 at%Te) with nominal composition of the ternary AgSbTe 2 phase. The melting point of this ternary compound has been determined previously [29,30] . This study determined the melting point temperature to be 555.1 °C, which is in good agreement with the findings of Wernick and Benson [29] . 4 Conclusions Thirteen primary solidification phase regions, including a ternary AgSbTe 2 phase region, are found in the ternary Ag–Sb–Te system. The Ag–Sb–Te liquidus projection is proposed based on metallographic observations and the thermal analysis results of the ternary alloys, and the phase equilibrium information of three constituent binary systems. Very fine microstructures with Ag 2 Te phase feature sizes in nanometers are observed. These microstructures are resulted from the class I reaction, liquid = δ + Ag 2 Te + AgSbTe 2 , with the liquid composition of Ag–40.0 at%Sb–36.0 at%Te at 496.5 °C. Since it has been reported that bulk thermoelectric materials with dispersed phase could have very good thermoelectric properties, alloys with nano-size Ag 2 Te ought to be investigated further. In addition, a unique microstructure with bright spherical phases uniformly dispersed in a matrix is found, and is resulted from a liquid miscibility gap extending from the Ag–Te binary edge into the ternary system at the Ag-rich corner. Acknowledgement The authors acknowledge the financial support of National Science Council in Taiwan through grant # NSC97-2221-E-007-067-MY3 . References [1] F.R. Yu J.J. Zhang D.L. Yu J.L. He Z.Y. Liu Bo Xu Y.J. Tian J. Appl. Phys. 104 2009 094303 094305 [2] B.A. Cook M.J. Kramer J.L. Harringa M.K. Han D.Y. Chung M.G. Kanatzidis Adv. Mater. 19 2009 1254 1259 [3] K.F. Hsu S. Loo F. Guo W. Chen J.S. Dyck C. Uher T. Hogan E.K. Polychroniadis M.G. Kanatzidis Science 303 2004 818 821 [4] J. Androulakis K.F. Hsu R. Pcionek H. Kong C. Uher J.J. D’Angelo A. Downey T. Hogan M.G. Kanatzidis Adv. Mater. 18 2006 1170 1173 [5] B. Poudel Q. Hao Y. Ma Y. Lan A. Minnich B. Yu X. Yan D. Wang A. Muto D. Vashaee X. Chen J. Liu M.S. Dresselhaus G. Chen Z. Ren Science 320 2008 634 638 [6] M.R. Marie G. Brun J.C. Tedenac J. Mater. Sci. 20 2 1985 730 735 [7] B.A. Cook X. Wei J.L. Harringa M.J. Kramer J. Mater. Sci. 42 2007 7643 7646 [8] S.H. Yang T.J. Zhu T. Sun J. He S.N. Zhang X.B. Zhao Nanotechnology 19 2008 245707 245711 [9] J.D. Sugar D.L. Medlin J. Alloys Compd. 478 2009 75 82 [10] T. Ikeda V.A. Ravi G.J. Snyder Acta Mater. 57 2009 666 672 [11] T. Ikeda V.A. Ravi G.J. Snyder Metall. Mater. Trans. A 41 2010 641 650 [12] T. Ikeda S.M. Haile V.A. Ravi H. Azizgolshani F. Gascoin G.J. Snyder Acta Mater. 55 2007 1227 1239 [13] F.N. Rhines Phase Diagrams in Metallurgy, Their Development and Application 1956 McGraw-Hill New York [14] S.W. Chen C.H. Wang S.K. Lin C.N. Chiu C.C. Chen JOM 59 2007 41 45 [15] S.K. Lin C.F. Yang S.H. Wu S.W. Chen J. Electron. Mater. 37 4 2008 498 506 [16] I. Karakaya W.T. Thompson J. Phase Equilib. 12 1991 56 63 [17] C.S. Oh J.H. Shim B.J. Lee D.N. Lee J. Alloys Compd. 238 1996 155 166 [18] G. Ghosh J. Phase Equilib. 15 3 1994 349 360 [19] M.C. Flemings Solidification Processing 1974 McGraw-Hill New York [20] J.D. Verhoeven Fundamentals of Physical Metallurgy 1975 John Wiley & Sons New York [21] L. Ratke S. Diefenbach Mater. Sci. Eng. RlS 1995 263 347 [22] D. Mirković J. Grőbner R. Schmid-Fetzer Acta Mater. 56 2008 5214 5222 [23] T. Ikeda L.A. Collins V.A. Ravi F.S. Gascoin S.M. Haile G.J. Snyder Chem. Mater. 19 4 2007 763 767 [24] S.W. Chen C.C. Huang J.C. Lin Chem. Eng. Sci. 50 3 1995 417 431 [25] S.W. Chen C.C. Huang Acta Mater. 44 1996 1955 1965 [26] S.C. Jeng S.W. Chen Acta Mater. 45 1997 4887 4899 [27] W.J. Boettinger U.R. Kattner Metall. Mater. Trans. A 33A 2002 1779 1794 [28] Y.C. Huang S.W. Chen K.S. Wu J. Electron. Mater. 39 1 2010 109 114 [29] J.H. Wernick K.E. Benson Phys. Soc. 3 1957 157 159 [30] R.M. Ayral-Marin G. Brun M. Maurin J.C. Tedenac Eur. Solid State Inorg. Chem. 27 5 1990 747 757