Grading and Decision-Making in (aneurysmal) Subarachnoid Haemorrhage

J.J.A.Mooij
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/159101990100700402
IF: 1.7
2001-01-01
Interventional Neuroradiology
Abstract:The interaction between medical doctors and patients in the diagnostic and therapeutic process is the result of both conscious and unconscious decision-making. When we succeed in making us aware of the decision processes, preferably based on sound facts and data, we are on the way from personal beliefs, institutional habits and educational fixations to a scientific, evidence based medical behaviour that will further improve our professional handling. Such analyses can be applied to every field in medicine, of course. In neurosurgery the field of subarachnoid haemorrhage is a great example of a battle ground where many beliefs and contradictory opinions still fight each other, resulting in so many papers on “how” and “when” to treat, to manage and to “cure” the patient. In the following survey, these problems will not be solved, but an analysis will be made of some of the general decision processes that play a part in the ultimate choice made for an individual patient. We will not go into the details of the technique of handling (clipping or coiling) specific aneurysms: these items will be dealt with separately during this course. One should be aware, however, that every step in these matters is again the result of decisions, sometimes made within fractions of seconds....
What problem does this paper attempt to address?