Physician and patient perspectives on the treatment decision process of unruptured brain aneurysms

Arwen Pieterse,Xiao Yu Eileen Liu,Gabriel Rinkel,Sapna Rawal,Ronit Agid,Patrick Nicholson,Ivan Radovanovic

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2022.10.340

IF: 3.467

2023-04-01

Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract:Introduction Decision making on treatment of unruptured brain aneurysms is challenging because the dramatic consequences of potential rupture over time have to be balanced against the immediate treatment risk and patient preferences need to be weighed in. We aimed to explore if there is a need for decision support. Methods For this prospective descriptive study, we asked patients with unruptured brain aneurysms and physicians involved in aneurysm care to complete a needs-assessment questionnaire that was developed based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Participants were asked to rate the importance of several factors that are considered during the decision-making process. Results 54 patients and 33 physicians participated. For physicians, the rupture risk was of highest importance for decision making (p<0.05), followed by technical feasibility, patient preferences, comorbidity, and age. Most physicians (73%) report that they discuss all management options with their patients; however, most patients (82%) reported that only one management option was discussed in clinic. Furthermore, most physicians expect that patients experience negative emotions and difficulty throughout the decision-making process, which is the opposite from what patients reported (p<0.0001). However, similar proportions of physicians and patients believed it would be beneficial for patients to receive general information (42%) on brain aneurysms, and decision support (42%) on the management of brain aneurysms. Discussion Patients indicated that one treatment option was discussed masking an existing decision conflict, which may explain the overall low rate of negative emotions and decision difficulty. Recall bias could play a role. Interestingly, both patients and physicians see value in additional patient information and decision support. Conclusions: These results seem to sufficiently underline the need for education and decision support for patients with unruptured brain aneurysms. A decision aid may facilitate shared decision-making for this patient population.

public, environmental & occupational health,social sciences, interdisciplinary