Review of Peters & Saarinen (1982): Processes, Beliefs and Questions

Jeroen Groenendijk,Martin Stokhof

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.9.3.07gro

1985-01-01

Studies in Language

Abstract:Preview this article: Stanley Peters & Esa Saarinen (eds.), Processes, Beliefs and Questions, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/sl.9.3.07gro-1.gif

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Reviewing, Revisiting, and Renewing the Foundations of Organization Design

John Joseph,Oliver Baumann,Richard Burton,Kannan Srikanth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220180000040012

2019-10-07

Advances in Strategic Management

Abstract:Advances in Strategic Management, Page 1-23.

English Else
The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework

Nicholas M. Hobson,Juliana Schroeder,Jane L. Risen,Dimitris Xygalatas,Michael Inzlicht

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317734944

IF: 16.161

2017-11-13

Personality and Social Psychology Review

Abstract:Traditionally, ritual has been studied from broad sociocultural perspectives, with little consideration of the psychological processes at play. Recently, however, psychologists have begun turning their attention to the study of ritual, uncovering the causal mechanisms driving this universal aspect of human behavior. With growing interest in the psychology of ritual, this article provides an organizing framework to understand recent empirical work from social psychology, cognitive science, anthropology, behavioral economics, and neuroscience. Our framework focuses on three primary regulatory functions of rituals: regulation of (a) emotions, (b) performance goal states, and (c) social connection. We examine the possible mechanisms underlying each function by considering the bottom-up processes that emerge from the physical features of rituals and top-down processes that emerge from the psychological meaning of rituals. Our framework, by appreciating the value of psychological theory, generates novel predictions and enriches our understanding of ritual and human behavior more broadly.

psychology, social
A review on superstructure optimization approaches in process system engineering

Luca Mencarelli,Qi Chen,Alexandre Pagot,Ignacio E. Grossmann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106808

2020-05-01

Abstract:In this paper, we survey the main superstructure-based approaches in process system engineering, with a particular emphasis on the existing literature for automated superstructure generation. We examine both classical and more recent representations in terms of generality, ease of use, and tractability. We also discuss the implications that different representations may have on strategies for algebraic modeling and optimization. We then review the state-of-the-art in software implementations to support synthesis. Finally, we examine the use of evolutionary—recently referred to as superstructure-free—approaches, in which algorithmic procedures dynamically generate and evaluate candidate process structures.

engineering, chemical,computer science, interdisciplinary applications
Sandra Jansen & Lucia Siebers (eds.), Processes of Change: Studies in Late Modern and Present-Day English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2019. Pp. Vii, 263. Hb. €105.

Jie Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s004740451900109x

2020-01-01

Language in Society

Abstract:An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Reviewing and Revisiting the Processes and Emergent States Underlying Team Diversity Effects

Christoph Reinert,Claudia Buengeler,Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock,Astrid C. Homan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964241275748

2024-10-30

Small Group Research

Abstract:Small Group Research, Ahead of Print. Understanding explanatory team processes and emergent states is crucial for facilitating potential benefits and hindering potential pitfalls of team diversity. This systematic review synthesizes research regarding the processes and states related to team diversity since the categorization-elaboration model's (CEM) introduction, against which we evaluate the literature. According to the CEM, an interplay of social and informational processes shapes diverse teams' effectiveness. We show that despite the wide recognition of this interplay logic, there is a misalignment between CEM's theoretical propositions and the actual conceptualizations and measurements of processes and states in primary studies. This misalignment is accompanied by primarily static designs and conceptualizations. Our review expands scholarly understanding of the interplay between social and informational processes and states in diverse teams, advancing knowledge of the diversity–team effectiveness relationship. Finally, we delineate imperatives for future research, embracing the dynamic nature of team processes and states.

psychology, applied, social,management
The Role of Dialectical Interrogation in Review Studies: Theorizing from What We See Rather Than What We Have Already Seen

Christina Hoon,Alina M. Baluch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12543

IF: 10.5

2019-12-06

Journal of Management Studies

Abstract:Review‐centric works receive increasing attention for generating insightful contributions to management and organization studies. Despite this, the literature on theory building has taken little note of their place in the theorizing process. This deserves attention, however, given the challenges reviews face in theorizing in the absence of new empirical observations. Accordingly, these works run the risk of merely summarizing 'what we have already seen', instead of 'maximizing what we see'. Drawing on the strategies of theorizing from similarities and theorizing from anomalies, we propose dialectical interrogation as a critical step in theorizing through which review scholars imaginatively engage in a back and forth inquiry between the phenomenal world of a given field and existing theory. By analyzing selected review studies from top management journals, we reveal that theorizing outcomes occur through two ways of dialectical interrogation (consolidative and disruptive). We contribute by demonstrating that review scholars can enter into powerful theorizing through the consolidative or disruptive interrogation of the review data with extant theory to detect emergence and novelty alongside puzzles, conflicts and paradoxes. Dialectical interrogation can address the shortcomings of current theorizing in review‐centric works and bears potential for advancing theories of management and organization studies.

management,business
Patterns Of Process Modeling

Wil M. P. Van Der Aalst,Arthur H. M. Ter Hofstede,Marlon Dumas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0471741442.ch8

2005-01-01

Abstract:9.1 INTRODUCTION The previous chapters have presented different languages and approaches to process modeling. In this chapter, we review some issues in process modeling from a more language-independent perspective. To this end, we rely on the concept of pattern: an " abstraction from a concrete form which keeps recurring in specific non-arbitrary contexts " [18]. The use of patterns is a proven practice in the context of object-oriented design, as evidenced by the impact made by the design patterns of Gamma et al. [10]. Process Aware Information Systems (PAISs) address a number of perspectives. Jablonski and Bussler [11] identify several such perspectives in the context of work-flow management. These include the process perspective (describing the control-flow), organization perspective (structuring of resources), data/information perspective (to structure data elements), operation perspective (to describe the atomic process elements) and integration perspective (to " glue " things together). 1 In a typical work-flow management system, the process perspective is described in terms of some graphical model, e.g. a variant of Petri nets (see Chapter 7), the organization perspective is described by specifying and populating roles and organizational units, the data/information perspective is described by associating data elements to work-flow instances (these may be typed and have a scope), the operation perspective is described by some scripting language used to launch external applications, and the integration perspective is described by some hierarchy of processes and activities. In principle, it is possible to define design patterns for each of these perspectives. However, the focus of this chapter is on patterns restricted to the process (i.e. control-flow) perspective. This perspective is the best understood as well as the dominant perspective of workflow. Patterns for the data perspective have been reported in [20], 1 Note that in [11] different terms are used.
Process Aware Information Systems: Bridging People and Software Through Process Technology

Marlon Dumas,Wil van der Aalst,Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-4070

2006-01-01

Choice Reviews Online

Abstract:In the last 10 years, there has been an explosion in the number of technologies, standards, and tools to provide process support. The book provides a unified and comprehensive overview of the principles, techniques and technologies underlying the emerging discipline of process aware information systems engineering. It brings together contributions from leading experts in this fast-growing field. Each chapter ends with a collection of thought-provoking exercises, which also makes it ideal as a text book. The book closes with a list of resources including suggested readings as well as URLs of relevantstandardization bodies, initiatives, and consortia
Designing as Construction of Representations: A Dynamic Viewpoint in Cognitive Design Research

Willemien Visser

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0711.1227

2007-11-08

Abstract:This article presents a cognitively oriented viewpoint on design. It focuses on cognitive, dynamic aspects of real design, i.e., the actual cognitive activity implemented by designers during their work on professional design projects. Rather than conceiving de-signing as problem solving - Simon's symbolic information processing (SIP) approach - or as a reflective practice or some other form of situated activity - the situativity (SIT) approach - we consider that, from a cognitive viewpoint, designing is most appropriately characterised as a construction of representations. After a critical discussion of the SIP and SIT approaches to design, we present our view-point. This presentation concerns the evolving nature of representations regarding levels of abstraction and degrees of precision, the function of external representations, and specific qualities of representation in collective design. Designing is described at three levels: the organisation of the activity, its strategies, and its design-representation construction activities (different ways to generate, trans-form, and evaluate representations). Even if we adopt a "generic design" stance, we claim that design can take different forms depending on the nature of the artefact, and we propose some candidates for dimensions that allow a distinction to be made between these forms of design. We discuss the potential specificity of HCI design, and the lack of cognitive design research occupied with the quality of design. We close our discussion of representational structures and activities by an outline of some directions regarding their functional linkages.

Human-Computer Interaction
Process-Centered Software Engineering Environments, A Brief History and Future Challenges

Volker Gruhn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020522111961

2002-01-01

Annals of Software Engineering

Abstract:Software engineering environments have a history of about two decades. Early environments provided support for small fragments of the software process (usually focusing on programming-in-the small). Then there was a trend towards support for more complete software processes (from early phases like requirements analysis and design down to testing and configuration management). Ten years ago the notion of process-centered software engineering environments initiated a new field in software engineering: software process research. The key idea is to use a model of a software process as input parameter for a software engineering environment. The environment is supposed to “behave” in accordance to the process model. Some aspects of this vision became true, others turned out to be of little practicability. In this article, we discuss the history of software engineering environments with a particular focus on process-centered software engineering environments (PCSEEs). We discuss the notion of distributed software processes (as one of the most substantial current trends in software process research) and we motivate the notion of a software process middleware which serves as basis of real-world software processes spread over various sites. In addition, we discuss some other trends in the software process research arena.
The aestheticization of business processes: visualizing their Gestalt for collective thinking

Monika Blattmeier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962231166438

IF: 5.15

2023-03-16

Journal of Information Technology

Abstract:Business processes, simply defined by Davenport as “structures for action”, organize the creation of value in a company. In addition to being carried out visibly, processes also have an inner dimension which remains hidden in the existing mechanistic metaphor of process management models. Aesthetic business processes draw from systems theory and Gestalt theory in order to uncover this inner dimension. The aim of this phenomenological investigation presented here is to describe the super-summative nature of business processes, in other words, to understand them holistically as a Gestalt. Mechanical Engineering students at a university of applied sciences analyzed business processes at different companies to discover patterns which they then visualized with the process participants at those companies. They used Christopher Alexander’s pattern language as a paradigm to make implicit knowledge buried in those business processes explicit. Using this technique, the structure of a pattern language for business process was developed, offering patterns for visualization as a tool for collective thinking and as a form for expressing the Gestalt of aesthetic business processes. The shared visualizations highlighted the nature of the business processes and made it possible to see, in a metaphorical way, their significant interactions.

information science & library science,management,computer science, information systems
Paradigms in Consumer Research: A Review of Perspectives and Aapproaches

Johan Arndt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eum0000000004660

IF: 5.181

1986-08-01

European Journal of Marketing

Abstract:Claims that the consumer behaviour field, during the last two decades, has become both multinational and multidisciplinary. States that marketing with its consumer behaviour, has become the most import sub‐field, while significant contributions to its understanding have been made by economists, psychologists, sociologists and political scientists. Attempts to prove that integrating the field into comprehensive models has not been very successful thus far, by using a different track. Organizes into 9 sections and addresses, finally, the further development of consumer theory and research. Posits that the majority of studies on consumer behaviour have approached the subject matter at the individual, rather than the group, level. Summarizes that the ‘gospel’ preached is that of individual, proactive, foresightful choice ‐ which is compatible with rationalistic culture, stressing volition and personal responsibility by broadening the field of consumer behaviour

business
Expanding the Concept of Sustainable Interaction Design: A Systematic Review

Nicola Besana,Peter Gall Krogh,Marianne Graves Petersen,Davide Spallazzo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177486

IF: 3.9

2024-08-31

Sustainability

Abstract:This paper presents a systemic literature review of Sustainable Interaction Design. We use the PRISMA model to guide the review. In the analysis of the identified papers, we identify an emergent and significant shift in the discourse on Sustainable Interaction Design from its original introduction in 2007. The shift in discourse concerns extensions both in the methodology as well as the impact, which is oddly underexplored. Regarding the methodology, we found that the objectives of sustainability are pursued by the concrete features of designed artifacts or through the use impact of design and that the design contains a process of learning for all participating parties, captured in the notion of sustainability in designing. By complementing this with the pursued impact of social, environmental, and economic sustainability, we point to where the current research tends to cluster, which areas are underexplored, and, thus, where new research agendas are needed. Here, the limited interest in studying how Interaction Design fosters sustainability while including an economic perspective stands out. In the concluding parts of this paper, we propose future research trajectories of SID and speculate and discuss opportunities and challenges for future research.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
Process over product: the next evolution of our quest for technology integration

Theodore J. Kopcha,Kalianne L. Neumann,Anne Ottenbreit-Leftwich,Elizabeth Pitman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09735-y

2020-01-21

Educational Technology Research and Development

Abstract:The purpose of this paper is to introduce the next evolution of our quest for technology integration, one that moves away from the product of teacher decision making (i.e., the type of use) towards their process of decision making. After presenting a brief history of our field's quest, we bring together three ideas about teacher decision making with technology that have emerged through the research: technology integration is (1) value driven, (2) embedded in a dynamic system, and (3) a product of a teacher's perception of what is possible. We then combine these ideas into a model of teacher decision making with technology that reflects how a teacher decides to integrate technology within a dynamic system. Implications for teacher beliefs research, professional development, and technology integration practice are discussed.

education & educational research
Critical success factors for campus interaction spaces and services – a systematic literature review

Sascha Naomi Jansz,Terry van Dijk,Mark P. Mobach

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/jfm-08-2019-0041

2020-01-27

Journal of Facilities Management

Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to create an overview of current literature and identify gaps in what is known about stimulating interaction through spaces and services provided on university campuses. Design/methodology/approach The authors used the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement methodology for systematic literature review. In total, 3,616 articles were screened, 31 articles were included. Facility Directors from 13 Dutch Universities were asked to define the search terms related to services. Findings Spaces and services were mostly studied separately. The majority of papers (18/31) were based on perceptions (surveys or interviews). The following critical success factors were identified in the literature: geographic proximity, cognitive proximity, scale, transitional spaces, comfort and experience, shared facilities and events, local buzz and networks. These factors are interrelated. The authors present a new relational model, from spaces and services, through interaction to innovation, visualising how the identified papers are related. Research limitations/implications The scope of possible findings may have been narrowed because prior relevant studies were rather limited and as a consequence of the search strategy designed to limit the number of unrelated hits. Some knowledge gaps may not have been identified, as only a few mainstream concepts related to the critical success factors were used for comparison. Nevertheless, the literature review provides a reliable overview of current academic knowledge regarding critical success factors for spaces and services that stimulate interaction on campuses. Originality/value This paper offers a novel perspective by emphasising the relational chain from interaction to innovation, visualising the large diversity in research fields and summarising the critical success factors in the literature.
Design Thinking and Organizational Culture: A Review and Framework for Future Research

Kimberly D. Elsbach,Ileana Stigliani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317744252

IF: 13.5

2018-01-16

Journal of Management

Abstract:Design thinking comprises an approach to problem solving that uses tools traditionally utilized by designers of commercial products, processes, and environments (e.g., designing a new car or the layout of a new airport). While design thinking was originally introduced as an approach that would work best when infused into the culture of an organization, most early studies of design thinking focused on identifying the specific tools and methods that might be used to solve management problems. Only recently have researchers examined how the implementation of design thinking might relate to organizational-level constructs, such as organizational culture. In this review, we examine empirical research (mostly from the past decade) that relates the practice of design thinking to the development of culture in organizations. Through this review, we identify how the use of specific design thinking tools supports the development of specific organizational cultures and vice versa. In addition, we identify how using design thinking tools produces emotional experiences and physical artifacts that help users to understand why and how specific cultures support the effective use of specific tools. Together, our review findings suggest that the experiential nature of design thinking tools and cultures (i.e., that they require people to actively engage in hands-on work) allows them to support one another. On the basis of this insight, we develop a general framework for organizing design thinking research and identify a number of avenues for future research that might advance our understanding of design thinking in organizational contexts.

management,business,psychology, applied
Revisiting Arnheim and Gombrich in Social Scientific Perspective

IAN VERSTEGEN

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12415

2018-02-04

Abstract:This article revisits an earlier social scientific analysis of the thought of Rudolf Arnheim and E. H. Gombrich. Adding to the earlier analysis in terms of social ontology and historical development is an analysis of the sufficiency of perception to yield information about the world, both in ordinary and in artistic contexts. Gombrich held to an idea of perception as hypothesis testing, and it joins with Popper's philosophy in the deferred warrant of the perceptual image. Arnheim, instead, followed the Gestalt theorists to believe that each stage of perceptual experience was incorrigible according to the given conditions. Consequently, Arnheim felt confident addressing the essence of art, while Gombrich remained anti‐essentialist. Ultimately, Gombrich's Popperian empiricism attenuates realism, whereas Arnheim's gestaltism seeks to build a bridge between ordinary and scientific observation.
Cultural differences in processing online customer reviews: holistic versus analytic thinkers

Benedikt M. Brand,Cristopher Siegfried Kopplin,Theresa Maria Rausch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00543-1

IF: 6.017

2022-04-28

Electronic Markets

Abstract:Abstract While the majority of studies exploring online customer reviews in the light of intercultural comparisons draw on the theoretical framework of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, which faced justifiable criticism, we make use of Socio-Cognitive Systems Theory to illustrate how consumers from different cultures are cognitively processing information. By employing this alternative theory, it is shown that the (heretofore established) Elaboration Likelihood Model for examining online customer reviews does not serve as an applicable framework in intercultural contexts. Reviewing extant literature, we uncover incidents questioning the generalizability of previous studies on review credibility conducted among East Asians. Building upon a research model established at a national level, we interviewed Western (German; n=552) and East Asian (Chinese; n=585) consumers to analyze the intercultural appropriateness of the model. The results empirically validate the assumptions of the Socio-Cognitive Systems Theory, and thus, finds Chinese to perceive review credibility holistically, whereas Germans tend to categorize its antecedents for evaluating them separately.

management,business
Doors of Perception to Space–Time- Meaning: Ideology, Religion, and Aesthetics in Balinese Development

Gusti Ayu Made Suartika,John Zerby,Alexander R. Cuthbert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331217750546

2018-01-01

Space and Culture

Abstract:This article develops a conceptual framework to examine the ancestry and evolution of urban forms within the context of cultural space and its social meaning. The framework is intended as a means for organizing and interpreting information, as was Rapoport’s schema, but differs in its perspective. Rapoport begins with design elements and links them to culture; we begin with culture as a process and connect it with contextual settings through which images and configurations are generated and positioned. The framework is applied to the cultural process in Bali by focusing on ideology, religion, and aesthetics, which are treated as the main “doors of perception.” This allows a connection with the concept of a social construction of space and highlights the importance of remediating social conflict with shared values. Examples are used to illustrate the relevance of the doors of perception to urban planning and design in completing the nexus to space–time meaning.

cultural studies,geography
Processes and Practices of Strategizing and Organizing: Review, Development, and the Role of Bridging and Umbrella Constructs

Steven W. Floyd,Joep P. Cornelissen,Mike Wright,Andrew Delios

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.01000.x

IF: 10.5

2011-04-05

Journal of Management Studies

Abstract:abstract The scope and purpose of this special issue is to draw interconnections between domains of strategy and strategic management research. Specifically, we initially conceptualized this special issue with two goals in mind: (1) to highlight and bridge intersections between strategy theories and bodies of scholarship; and (2) to advance and mainstream ways in which an explicit organizational dimension can be fostered in strategy and strategic management research. The papers selected for the issue capture this set of aspirations in various ways, and, as such, they collectively offer a foundation for extending strategy and strategic management research in exciting new directions. We start our introduction by providing a brief overview of the contributions provided by each paper in the context of three broad strategy themes: strategy and process; resources and organizational growth; and environment and institutional context. We subsequently discuss the potential for integration of research across these themes, and highlight the importance of what we define as bridging and umbrella constructs that are able to connect various strategy and organizational phenomena in coherent and meaningful ways. We elaborate the important distinction between these two constructs and their respective roles within theory development, and use that to drive and articulate directions for further research.

management,business

Review of Peters & Saarinen (1982): Processes, Beliefs and Questions

Reviewing, Revisiting, and Renewing the Foundations of Organization Design

The Psychology of Rituals: An Integrative Review and Process-Based Framework

A review on superstructure optimization approaches in process system engineering

Sandra Jansen & Lucia Siebers (eds.), Processes of Change: Studies in Late Modern and Present-Day English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2019. Pp. Vii, 263. Hb. €105.

Reviewing and Revisiting the Processes and Emergent States Underlying Team Diversity Effects

The Role of Dialectical Interrogation in Review Studies: Theorizing from What We See Rather Than What We Have Already Seen

Patterns Of Process Modeling

Process Aware Information Systems: Bridging People and Software Through Process Technology

Designing as Construction of Representations: A Dynamic Viewpoint in Cognitive Design Research

Process-Centered Software Engineering Environments, A Brief History and Future Challenges

The aestheticization of business processes: visualizing their Gestalt for collective thinking

Paradigms in Consumer Research: A Review of Perspectives and Aapproaches

Expanding the Concept of Sustainable Interaction Design: A Systematic Review

Process over product: the next evolution of our quest for technology integration

Critical success factors for campus interaction spaces and services – a systematic literature review

Design Thinking and Organizational Culture: A Review and Framework for Future Research

Revisiting Arnheim and Gombrich in Social Scientific Perspective

Cultural differences in processing online customer reviews: holistic versus analytic thinkers

Doors of Perception to Space–Time- Meaning: Ideology, Religion, and Aesthetics in Balinese Development

Processes and Practices of Strategizing and Organizing: Review, Development, and the Role of Bridging and Umbrella Constructs