Electrodeposition of Epitaxial Magnetite Films and Ferrihydrite Nanoribbons on Single-Crystal Gold

Elizabeth A. Kulp,Hiten M. Kothari,Steven J. Limmer,Jinbo Yang,Rakesh V. Gudavarthy,Eric W. Bohannan,Jay A. Switzer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/cm9013514
IF: 10.508
2009-01-01
Chemistry of Materials
Abstract:Magnetite (Fe3O4), ferrihydrite (Fe10O14(OH)(2)), and iron (Fe) films were elect rodeposited by cathodic deposition from an alkaline Fe(III)-triethanolamine solution. The electrode posited phase depended oil the applied potential. Magnetite films were elect rodeposited from -1.01 to -1.10 V vs Ag/AgCl, whereas ferrihydrite films were deposited from -1.10 to -1.20 V vs Ag/AgCl. Iron deposition occurred at more negative potentials. The polycrystalline films were characterized using X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and Mossbauer spectroscopy. Epitaxial magnetite films on low-index gold crystals were produced at three different potentials. X-ray diffraction analysis of the magnetite films deposited at -1.01, -1.05, and -1.10 V vs Ag/AgCl showed [111] oriented films on Au(III) and Au(001). Because of twinning of the {111} planes, the [511] orientation was present in thicker films. Magnetite grew with a [110] orientation on Au(110). At the more negative potentials of -1.10 and -1.20 V vs Ag/AgCl, ferrihydrite deposited with an (11 (2) over bar0) orientation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?