Abstract:Background The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) has become one of the most widely used measurement tools in child and adolescent mental health work across the globe. The SDQ was originally developed and validated within the UK and whilst its reliability and validity have been replicated in several countries important cross cultural issues have been raised. We describe normative data, reliability and validity of the Chinese translation of the SDQ (parent, teacher and self report versions) in a large group of children from Shanghai. Methods The SDQ was administered to the parents and teachers of students from 12 of Shanghai's 19 districts, aged between 3 and 17 years old, and to those young people aged between 11 and 17 years. Retest data was collected from parents and teachers for 45 students six weeks later. Data was analysed to describe normative scores, bandings and cut-offs for normal, borderline and abnormal scores. Reliability was assessed from analyses of internal consistency, inter-rater agreement, and temporal stability. Structural validity, convergent and discriminant validity were assessed. Results Full parent and teacher data was available for 1965 subjects and self report data for 690 subjects. Normative data for this Chinese urban population with bandings and cut-offs for borderline and abnormal scores are described. Principle components analysis indicates partial agreement with the original five factored subscale structure however this appears to hold more strongly for the Prosocial Behaviour, Hyperactivity – Inattention and Emotional Symptoms subscales than for Conduct Problems and Peer Problems. Internal consistency as measured by Cronbach's α coefficient were generally low ranging between 0.30 and 0.83 with only parent and teacher Hyperactivity – Inattention and teacher Prosocial Behaviour subscales having α > 0.7. Inter-rater correlations were similar to those reported previously (range 0.23 – 0.49) whilst test retest reliability was generally lower than would be expected (range 0.40 – 0.79). Convergent and discriminant validity are supported. Conclusion We report mixed findings with respect the psychometric properties of the Chinese translation of the SDQ. Reliability is a particular concern particularly for Peer Problems and self ratings by adolescents. There is good support for convergent validity but only partial support for structural validity. It may be possible to resolve some of these issues by carefully examining the wording and meaning of some of the current questions.

1368 – Study on validity and reliability of the chinese version of parenting styles and dimensions questionnaire (PSDQ)

Can Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ) Be Used in China?

Revising the Child and Adolescent Perfectionism Scale

The Validity, Reliability and Normative Scores of the Parent, Teacher and Self Report Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in China.

The Reliability and Validity of a Chinese Version of the Parental Bonding Instrument

Psychometric Evaluation of the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire in Chinese Parents

[Studies of the Norm of Karitane Parenting Confidence Scale(KPCS)among Parents of Infants in Urban Areas of China].

A115: Revision of the Chinese Version of Physical Self-Description Questionnaire-Short for Middle School Students

The reliability and validity of Child-to-parent Violence Questionnaire (CPV-Q) among Chinese adolescents

Refining The Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (Psi-Sf) In Chinese Parents

A Study on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire(SDQ)

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Adverse Childhood Experiences Inter-National Questionnaire in Parents of Preschool Children

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+: A Study with Chinese College Students

Validation of Bangla parenting style and dimension questionnaire

Adaptation and validation of the Parental Behaviour Scale for Autism Spectrum Disorder in Chinese parents

The Applicability of the Parenting Sytle Index to Nanjing and Shanghai Adolescents

Psychometric Properties of the Adolescence Revision of Co-parenting Scale

Reversion of Preschool Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale in Chinese Preschoolers: Validity and Reliability

Psychometric Properties of the Caregiver Strain Questionnaire among Chinese Parents of Children with ADHD or ASD

Chinese Revision of Buri’s Parental Authority Questionnaire

Application of Chinese Version of the Self-report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnair in a Sample of 832 Adolescents