Abstract:Background The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) has become one of the most widely used measurement tools in child and adolescent mental health work across the globe. The SDQ was originally developed and validated within the UK and whilst its reliability and validity have been replicated in several countries important cross cultural issues have been raised. We describe normative data, reliability and validity of the Chinese translation of the SDQ (parent, teacher and self report versions) in a large group of children from Shanghai. Methods The SDQ was administered to the parents and teachers of students from 12 of Shanghai's 19 districts, aged between 3 and 17 years old, and to those young people aged between 11 and 17 years. Retest data was collected from parents and teachers for 45 students six weeks later. Data was analysed to describe normative scores, bandings and cut-offs for normal, borderline and abnormal scores. Reliability was assessed from analyses of internal consistency, inter-rater agreement, and temporal stability. Structural validity, convergent and discriminant validity were assessed. Results Full parent and teacher data was available for 1965 subjects and self report data for 690 subjects. Normative data for this Chinese urban population with bandings and cut-offs for borderline and abnormal scores are described. Principle components analysis indicates partial agreement with the original five factored subscale structure however this appears to hold more strongly for the Prosocial Behaviour, Hyperactivity – Inattention and Emotional Symptoms subscales than for Conduct Problems and Peer Problems. Internal consistency as measured by Cronbach's α coefficient were generally low ranging between 0.30 and 0.83 with only parent and teacher Hyperactivity – Inattention and teacher Prosocial Behaviour subscales having α > 0.7. Inter-rater correlations were similar to those reported previously (range 0.23 – 0.49) whilst test retest reliability was generally lower than would be expected (range 0.40 – 0.79). Convergent and discriminant validity are supported. Conclusion We report mixed findings with respect the psychometric properties of the Chinese translation of the SDQ. Reliability is a particular concern particularly for Peer Problems and self ratings by adolescents. There is good support for convergent validity but only partial support for structural validity. It may be possible to resolve some of these issues by carefully examining the wording and meaning of some of the current questions.

The Applicability of the Parenting Sytle Index to Nanjing and Shanghai Adolescents

Can Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ) Be Used in China?

1368 – Study on validity and reliability of the chinese version of parenting styles and dimensions questionnaire (PSDQ)

Refining The Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (Psi-Sf) In Chinese Parents

Development and Validation of the Academic Parenting Scale for Chinese Parents of Primary School Students

PERCEIVED PARENTING STYLES AND DISORDERED PERSONALITY TRAITS IN ADOLESCENT AND ADULT STUDENTS AND IN PERSONALITY DISORDER PATIENTS

The Reliability and Validity of a Chinese Version of the Parental Bonding Instrument

The integral contributions of parental involvement and parenting style to adolescent adjustments: a regression mixture analysis

Application of the Chinese version of Parent Behavior Inventory

Parenting Practice Profiling and Its Associated Factors among Secondary Vocational School Students in China

Parental Socialization and Development of Chinese Youths: A Multivariate and Comparative Approach

Revision and Validation of the Parental Autonomy Support Scale Among Chinese College Students

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Basic Psychological Needs Scale

Parenting style profiling, parent-child relationships, and their impacts on adolescents' social-emotional skills in China

Development and Validation of Chinese Parental Involvement and Support Scale for Preschool Children

Authoritative and Authoritarian Parenting Practices and Social and School Performance in Chinese Children

The Validity, Reliability and Normative Scores of the Parent, Teacher and Self Report Versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in China.

Parental Rearing Styles and Peer Acceptance:Mediating Role of Psychological Suzhi in Children Aged 8 to 12

Chinese Parental Involvement and Adolescent Learning Motivation and Subjective Well-Being: More is not Always Better

Impact of Parenting Styles on Adolescent Well-Being in China

Parenting style and the non-cognitive development of high school student: evidence from rural China