Abstract:This paper adopts minutely high-frequency data of yields,volumes and open interests of the six commodities futures in three exchanges of China to probe into their intraday change patterns,and discovers the `L' pattern intraday movement of absolute yield and volume.We exert financial market microstructure theory,traders' psychology and trading mechanism to explain the different intraday phenomenon between the futures market and the stock market,which has a distinctive `U' pattern.Basing on this,by the help of Granger causality test theories and Vector Autoregressive models(VAR),we study the factors that influence the volatility of yields and the lagged orders.The results show that there are two-way Granger causality among each two of the absolute yield,volume and open interest, which is different from the empirical result of the stock market that there is a one-way Granger causality from volume to absolute yield,and the difference comes from the short mechanism of futures market.Through the decomposition of variance of VAR models and the impulse response analysis,we empirically analyze the dynamic relationship among the three factors.The conclusion shows that: when we treat the volatility of absolute yield as an explained variable,the residual disturbance can be explained about 90% by its lagged terms,and volume can explain about 10%.When volume is interpreted as an explained variable,about 80% of the residual disturbance can be explained by its lagged terms and the volatility of the absolute price explains about 20%.When open interest is considered as an explained variable,lagged terms of its own interprets about 45% to 70% of the residual disturbance,the volume explains 25%-45%,and the volatility of absolute price explains 5% to 10%.All the explanatory variables reach stable about 20-30 minutes later.Empirical result tells the weak impact from open interest to volatility of absolute yield and volume and the strong correlation between volatility of absolute yield and volume.Some investment suggestions are offered from the analysis mentioned above.

Risk Contributions of Trading and Non-Trading Hours: Evidence from Chinese Commodity Futures Markets

An empirical study on information spillover effects between the Chinese copper futures market and spot market

Time-varying Copula Models in the Shipping Derivatives Market

Extreme Risk Spillovers Between China and Major International Stock Markets

Volatility Forecasting: the Role of Lunch-Break Returns, Overnight Returns, Trading Volume and Leverage Effects

The Comparison of Chinese Copper Futures Market VaR Estimation Using Parametric Method , Semiparametric Method and Nonparametric Method

A Risk Measurement Model of China's Non-Ferrous Metal Futures Market

Overnight Returns of Stock Indexes: Evidence from ETFs and Futures

Analysis of Information Spillover Effect Between Futures Market and Spot Market

Can Commodity Futures Margin Requirements Control Risks Effectively? Evidence from China

A Study of Risk Spillover Between Futures and Spot Markets——An Empirical Analysis on China's Soybean Market

Determinants and Information Content of Intraday Bid-Ask Spreads: Evidence from Chinese Commodity Futures Markets

Impacts of Major Risk Events on Commodity Futures Markets in China

Intraday Effects Analysis of Chinese Futures Markets

What drives risk in China’s soybean futures market? Evidence from a flexible GARCH-MIDAS model

Research on China Futures Market Price Duration Volatility Cluster Effect

Asymmetric Information and Volatility Forecasting in Commodity Futures Markets

Information transmission in informationally linked markets: Evidence from US and Chinese commodity futures markets

Can night trading reduce price volatility? Evidence from China's corn and corn starch futures markets

Including Commodity Futures in Asset Allocation in China

Tail dependence structure and extreme risk spillover effects between the international agricultural futures and spot markets