Abstract:This paper adopts minutely high-frequency data of yields,volumes and open interests of the six commodities futures in three exchanges of China to probe into their intraday change patterns,and discovers the `L' pattern intraday movement of absolute yield and volume.We exert financial market microstructure theory,traders' psychology and trading mechanism to explain the different intraday phenomenon between the futures market and the stock market,which has a distinctive `U' pattern.Basing on this,by the help of Granger causality test theories and Vector Autoregressive models(VAR),we study the factors that influence the volatility of yields and the lagged orders.The results show that there are two-way Granger causality among each two of the absolute yield,volume and open interest, which is different from the empirical result of the stock market that there is a one-way Granger causality from volume to absolute yield,and the difference comes from the short mechanism of futures market.Through the decomposition of variance of VAR models and the impulse response analysis,we empirically analyze the dynamic relationship among the three factors.The conclusion shows that: when we treat the volatility of absolute yield as an explained variable,the residual disturbance can be explained about 90% by its lagged terms,and volume can explain about 10%.When volume is interpreted as an explained variable,about 80% of the residual disturbance can be explained by its lagged terms and the volatility of the absolute price explains about 20%.When open interest is considered as an explained variable,lagged terms of its own interprets about 45% to 70% of the residual disturbance,the volume explains 25%-45%,and the volatility of absolute price explains 5% to 10%.All the explanatory variables reach stable about 20-30 minutes later.Empirical result tells the weak impact from open interest to volatility of absolute yield and volume and the strong correlation between volatility of absolute yield and volume.Some investment suggestions are offered from the analysis mentioned above.

Including Commodity Futures in Asset Allocation in China

Extreme Risk Spillovers Between China and Major International Stock Markets

Emerging Impact of Chinese Commodity Futures Market on Domestic and Global Economy

New Test of Asset Pricing Models in China

Dynamic connectedness and hedging opportunities of the commodity and stock markets in China: evidence from the TVP-VAR and cDCC-FIAPARCH

Quantile connectedness of the Chinese commodity sectors

A Study of Risk Spillover Between Futures and Spot Markets——An Empirical Analysis on China's Soybean Market

Intraday Effects Analysis of Chinese Futures Markets

Commodity tail risk and equity risk premia

Research on China Futures Market Price Duration Volatility Cluster Effect

Uncovering the Sino-US dynamic risk spillovers effects: Evidence from agricultural futures markets

Connectedness and risk spillover in China's commodity futures sectors

Liquidity of China’s agricultural futures market: measurement and cross-market dependence

Estimating optimal hedging ratio and hedging efficiency in China's stock market

Global Oil Shocks and China’s Commodity Markets: the Role of OVX

Index Investment and Financialization of Commodities

The Impact of Trading Restrictions and Margin Requirements on Stock Index Futures

Extreme Connectedness Across Chinese Stock and Commodity Futures Markets

Time-frequency connectedness and cross-quantile dependence between crude oil, Chinese commodity market, stock market and investor sentiment

Does commodity exposure benefit traditional portfolios? Evidence from India

Can Commodity Futures Margin Requirements Control Risks Effectively? Evidence from China