Abstract:PurposeThe effect of board intellectual capital on non-profit organizational performance in non-western, less developed economies has been an important yet under-researched area. Given that the institutional and business relationships of a board account for the majority of board intellectual capital, the purpose of this paper is to fill the previously mentioned research gap by addressing how the interactions of the two relationships of board directors influence Chinese philanthropic foundation performance.Design/methodology/approachFollowing Creswell's (2014) explanatory sequential mixed-methodology, a qualitative study (Study 1) was first conducted to pre-test the assumptions, and then a quantitative study (Study 2) was carried out based on a secondary database of 1,405 Chinese philanthropic foundations to further examine the hypotheses. Several regression models were built for analyzing the results.FindingsStudy 1 confirmed that Chinese philanthropic foundations gained greater revenues and hosted more public welfare activities by leveraging the reinforcing or complementary effects of board directors' intellectual capital to improve organizational performance. Study 2 further examined the hypotheses that the interactions of intellectual capital increased the total revenue and public welfare expenditure of the foundations; however, significant positive relationships were only identified in foundations at the local level, and no significant associations were found in those at the national level.Practical implicationsThe research indicates that the intellectual capital of board directors may influence the performance of their philanthropic foundations. Thus, Chinese philanthropic foundations should be more aware of the importance of this influence when determining which candidates will join the board.Originality/valueThe study makes significant contributions to the existing knowledge of the development of non-governmental organizations; it incorporates the resource dependence theory and agency theory into understanding how the intricate interactions between the institutional and business relationships of board directors affect foundation performance and how the jurisdiction affiliations act as a boundary condition for such relationships in a non-western setting such as China.

Corporate Philanthropy and Bank Loans in China

Corporate Philanthropy and Corporate Misconduct: Evidence from China

Corporate Philanthropy and Tunneling: Evidence from China

Loan Financing and Investment in Princeling-Backed Firms

How Does Corporate Social Responsibility Have Influence on Firms' Access to Trade Credit

Doing Good Deeds at a Constant Speed

The Influence of Board Directors' Institutional and Business Relationships on Philanthropic Foundation Performance

Political Connections And Loan Availability: Evidence From Chinese Private Firms

Can Corporate Philanthropy Be Driven from the Bottom to the Top? Evidence from China

Chinese Private Corporate Philanthropy: Social Responsibility, Legitimacy Strategy, and the Role of Political Capital

Social responsibility and corporate borrowing

What Drives Corporate Charitable Contributions, Market Forces, Government Influences, or Political Goodwill? Evidence from China

Business Owners’ Achieved Social Status and Corporate Philanthropy: Evidence from Chinese Private Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises

Business Owners’ Achieved Social Status and Corporate Philanthropy

Corporate philanthropy, political connections, and costs of equity capital

The Functions of the Board of Directors in Corporate Philanthropy: An Empirical Study From China

Benefits Embedded in Benevolence? An Empirically Instrumental Analysis of Corporate Philanthropic Donations

Institution and Corporate Philanthropy: Evidence from Chinese Private Firms

Religious atmosphere, seismic impact, and corporate charitable donations in China

Competing for private investments in public equity in China: The role of corporate philanthropy

Research the Impact of Corporate Philanthropy Giving on Firm Financial Performance——Based on the Consumers' Perspective