Abstract:Purpose - The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of unidentifiable individual differences among financial analysts on the cross section of their earnings forecast accuracy.Design/methodology/approach - The paper employs the concept of analyst fixed effects to control for unidentifiable individual differences. Various psychological factors, such as decision style and personality traits, are documented to impact individuals' decision making. However, analysts' individual differences in such psychological factors are not captured by identifiable personal attributes employed in finance literature, such as years of experience. The methodology used addresses this issue and presents a more comprehensive study of analyst forecast accuracy.Findings - The paper documents that unidentifiable analyst-specific effects are significant, and that controlling for them improves model fitting and changes the explanatory power of some of the traditionally used independent variables in the literature. The paper confirms that the analyst's firm-specific experience, the intensity of following that a firm receives, and the forecast horizon are all significantly and consistently related to forecast accuracy. However, it is found that analyst general experience and coverage complexity lose explanatory power when individual differences are controlled for. Analyst general experience is not monotonically associated with better accuracy and that analysts only benefit from increased general experience during the early to middle stages of their career. Finally, when analysts' individual differences are controlled for, the boldness of a forecast revision is not associated with the improvement of accuracy.Research limitations/implications - The documented non-monotonic relationship between analyst general experience and forecast accuracy is explained as a result of U-shaped self-efficacy, decision style and career concerns. This observation is not necessarily in line with the theory of analyst seniority and reputation-related performance.Originality/value - The methodology used addresses the issue of analysts' individual differences in psychological factors and presents a more comprehensive study of analyst forecast accuracy.

The Efficiency of Earnings Forecast Pricing

The Effects of Investor Responses to Meeting Consensus Forecasts

Do Managers Always Know Better? The Relative Accuracy of Management and Analyst Forecasts

The Associations Between Performance Changes of Listed Companies and Analysts’Forecast

Can Analysts’ Focus on Innovation-Related Information Improve the Accuracy of Forecasts? Chinese Full Text

Are Accounting Estimate Changes Associated with an Aggressive Earnings Effect? Empirical Evidence

Financial Analyst vs. Statistical Model:The Relative Accuracy of Analyst Forecasts and Its Determinants

Posterior Probability Model For Stock Return Prediction Based On Analyst'S Recommendation Behavior

Individual Differences and Analyst Forecast Accuracy

Doing good in periods of high uncertainty: Economic policy uncertainty, corporate social responsibility, and analyst forecast error

Price Shocks, News Disclosures, and Asymmetric Drifts

Information Diffusion and the Boundary of Market Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from Earnings Announcements

Overprecise Forecasts

Do Analysts Overreact to Extreme Good News in Earnings?

Managerial incentives and management forecast precision

Expectation disarray: Analysts' growth forecast anomaly in China

Earnings management and analyst forecast

Disclosure Quality and Earnings Forecast

The Earnings Forecasting Model Based on Cost Stickiness and It's Forecast Accuracy Test

Short Selling Pressure, Stock Price Behavior, and Management Forecast Precision: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

Information Externalities, Analyst Research Resource Allocation, and Stock Pricing Efficiency