Abstract:A common, long-held belief is that metabolic rate drives the rates of various biological, ecological and evolutionary processes. Although this metabolic pacemaker view (as assumed by the recent, influential 'metabolic theory of ecology') may be true in at least some situations (e.g. those involving moderate temperature effects or physiological processes closely linked to metabolism, such as heartbeat and breathing rate), it suffers from several major limitations, including: (i) it is supported chiefly by indirect, correlational evidence (e.g. similarities between the body-size and temperature scaling of metabolic rate and that of other biological processes, which are not always observed) - direct, mechanistic or experimental support is scarce and much needed; (ii) it is contradicted by abundant evidence showing that various intrinsic and extrinsic factors (e.g. hormonal action and temperature changes) can dissociate the rates of metabolism, growth, development and other biological processes; (iii) there are many examples where metabolic rate appears to respond to, rather than drive the rates of various other biological processes (e.g. ontogenetic growth, food intake and locomotor activity); (iv) there are additional examples where metabolic rate appears to be unrelated to the rate of a biological process (e.g. ageing, circadian rhythms, and molecular evolution); and (v) the theoretical foundation for the metabolic pacemaker view focuses only on the energetic control of biological processes, while ignoring the importance of informational control, as mediated by various genetic, cellular, and neuroendocrine regulatory systems. I argue that a comprehensive understanding of the pace of life must include how biological activities depend on both energy and information and their environmentally sensitive interaction. This conclusion is supported by extensive evidence showing that hormones and other regulatory factors and signalling systems coordinate the processes of growth, metabolism and food intake in adaptive ways that are responsive to an organism's internal and external conditions. Metabolic rate does not merely dictate growth rate, but is coadjusted with it. Energy and information use are intimately intertwined in living systems: biological signalling pathways both control and respond to the energetic state of an organism. This review also reveals that we have much to learn about the temporal structure of the pace of life. Are its component processes highly integrated and synchronized, or are they loosely connected and often discordant? And what causes the level of coordination that we see? These questions are of great theoretical and practical importance.

Why the Statement: `Plasma-Membrane Transport is Rate-Limiting for Its Metabolism in Rat-Liver Parenchymal Cells'1 Cannot Meet the Public

The complex dynamics of scientific communication

This is not about the molecules -- On the Violation of Momentum Conservation in Biology. A short comment

Is society a self-organizing system?

Sociological and Communication-Theoretical Perspectives on the Commercialization of the Sciences

Non-equilibrium Steady States in Catalysis, Molecular Motors, and Supramolecular Materials: Why Networks and Language Matter

Some paradoxes in the Tilman model, how to avoid or accept them

Open chemical reaction networks, steady-state loads and Braess-like paradox

Beyond the Newtonian Paradigm: A Statistical Mechanics of Emergence

Is metabolic rate a universal ‘pacemaker’ for biological processes?

Irreversibilites in Science and Technology Networks: an Empirical and Analytical Approach

Universal limiting behaviour of reaction-diffusion systems with conservation laws

Thermodynamic Bounds on Symmetry Breaking in Linear and Catalytic Biochemical Systems

Self-Organization and The Origins of Life: The Managed-Metabolism Hypothesis

Cultural and Biological Evolution

The Communication Turn in Philosophy of Science

Complex Systems Theory: Some Considerations for Sociology

From inert matter to the global society life as multi-level networks of processes

The control of phenotype: connecting enzyme variation to physiology

A third transition in science?

The illusion of balance in the history of the biosphere