Abstract:In 1966 Francis Crick declared that: "The ultimate aim of the modern movement in biology is to explain all biology in terms of physics and chemistry." This motivated us to contemplate approaches that unify biology at a fundamental level. Exploration led us to consider the features of energy, entropy, and motion. Overall, it can be considered that motion of matter is the feature of life function. No motion. No function. In initial work we evaluated the hypothesis that the scope for biologic function is mediated mechanistically by a differential for energy transfer. Maximal treadmill running capacity served as a proxy for energy transfer. The span for capacity was estimated "biologically" by application of two-way artificial selection in rats for running capacity. Consistent with our "Energy Transfer Hypothesis" (ETH), low physical health and dysfunction segregated with low running capacity and high physical health and function segregated with high running capacity. The high energy yield of aerobic metabolism is also consonant with the ETH; that is, amongst the elements of the universe, oxygen is second only to fluorine in electronegativity. Although we deem these energy findings possibly correct, they are based on correlation and do not illuminate function via fundamental principles. For consideration of life, Entropy (2nd Law of thermodynamics) can be viewed as an open system that exchanges energy with the universe operating via nonequilibrium thermodynamics. The Principle of Maximal Entropy Production (MEP) states that: If a source of free energy is present, complex systems can intercept the free energy flow, and self-organize to enhance entropy production. The development of Benard convection cells in a water heat gradient demonstrate simplistic operation of MEP. A direct step forward would be to explain the mechanism of the obligatory motion of molecules for life function. Motion may be mediated by operation of "action at a distance" for molecules as considered by the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox and confirmed by JS Bell. Magnetism, electricity, and gravity are also examples of action at a distance. We propose that some variant of "action at a distance" as directed by the property of Maximal Entropy Production (MEP) underwrites biologic motion.

This is not about the molecules -- On the Violation of Momentum Conservation in Biology. A short comment

Broken Symmetry in Neoclassical Transport Theory

Conservation laws and the foundations of quantum mechanics

Conservation laws and energy transformations in a class of common physics problems

A problem with the conservation law observed in macroscopic quantum phenomena is a consequence of violation of the correspondence principle

Keep the Momentum: Conservation Laws beyond Euclidean Gradient Flows

Conservation Laws For Every Quantum Measurement Outcome

Dynamical Exclusion of Probability and Energy Conservation

Is Electromagnetic Field Momentum Due to the Flow of Field Energy?

Why the Statement: `Plasma-Membrane Transport is Rate-Limiting for Its Metabolism in Rat-Liver Parenchymal Cells'1 Cannot Meet the Public

Classical Mechanics from Energy Conservation or: Why not Momentum?

Charged Particles are Prevented from Going Faster than the Speed of Light by Light Itself: A Biophysical Cell Biologist's Contribution to Physics

Momentum work and the energetic foundations of physics. I. Newton’s laws of motion tailored to processes

On conservation laws in quantum mechanics

The Role of Conservation Principles in the Abraham--Minkowski Controversy

Illustrations of the Relativistic Conservation Law for the Center of Energy

Conservation of Charge and Conservation of Current

Comment on "Trouble with the Lorentz Law of Force: Incompatibility with Special Relativity and Momentum Conservation"

Biology: Motion is Function