Rhenium carbides phase diagram under pressure and explaining why WC-type ReC does not exist
Peiju Hu,Xing Xie,Lingling Bai,Runqing Zhang,Xunjiang Zhang,Jiaying Sun,Huafeng Dong,Minru Wen,Fugen Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0087688
IF: 2.877
2022-01-01
Journal of Applied Physics
Abstract:The stability of W-C compounds (WC)-type ReC has been controversial for many years. Here, based on ab initio algorithm, we systematically searched for stable structures in the rhenium-carbon (Re-C) system at 0-300 gigapascal (GPa) pressure and analyzed the phase diagram within the pressure range. Only P6(3)/mmc-Re2C, C2/m-Re3C, P2(1)/m-Re4C, and C2/m-Re5C2 phases are found to be stable under 0-300 GPa, while WC-type ReC has high enthalpy and does not appear in the phase diagram. We also discussed the stability of WC-type ReC. Among these structures, C2/m-Re3C, P2(1)/m-Re4C, and C2/m-Re5C2 are hitherto unknown structures, which could maintain dynamic and mechanical stability under ambient pressure. In addition, through the analysis of the structural and mechanical properties, P6(3)/mmc-Re2C is the hardest metal among them with 31.5 GPa Vickers hardness at 0 GPa, and the metastable P 6 over bar m 2-Re5C3 has the second-highest hardness (29.3 GPa), both of which exceed the hardness of TiN (18.7 GPa), the commercial material used for cutting tools. The study of Re-C compounds with high hardness provides theoretical guidance for further experimental research.& nbsp;Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.