When is the Right Time? A Little Later! Delayed Responses Show Better Temporal Control

yan bao,ernst poppel,wei liang,taoxi yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.370
2014-01-01
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Abstract:Human behaviour is characterized both by action and reaction; the action mode can be conceived of as being embedded in anticipatory control, whereas the reactive mode requires the instantaneous processing of stimuli. In the reaction mode, tasks have to be completed (most of the time) as fast as possible; in the action mode, the task is to act “at the right time” anticipating the consequences of one's actions. A control machinery for the action mode has been suggested some time ago by the “reafference principle” (von Holst & Mittelstaedt, 1950), the theoretical concept already being formulated by Ernst Mach and Hermann von Helmholtz in the 19th century. The basic idea is that an action program not only initiates a motor program, but an efference copy is drawn from this program, which is compared after the completion of the movement with the re-afference. When efference copy and reafference match, the movement program is cancelled, i.e., the movement has come to an end. There are plenty of examples to support the basic notion of the re-afference principle, but there remains one essential shortcoming, i.e., the temporal domain. The re-afference principle is conceived of as being temporally neutral which is both theoretically and practically not satisfying. How can one test temporal constraints that might shed some more light on behavioural control?
What problem does this paper attempt to address?