Influences of Different RT-qPCR Methods on Forensic Body Fluid Identification by Microrna

Zhilong Li,Peng Bai,Duo Peng,Bing Long,Lin Zhang,Weibo Liang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigss.2015.09.117
2015-01-01
Forensic Science International Genetics Supplement Series
Abstract:MicroRNA (miRNA) has attracted wide interest of the forensic community since Hanson attempted to search specific microRNAs for body fluid identification from microarray. Research groups have screened out some sets of miRNA markers that can be used in forensic body fluids identification up to now. Most of those miRNA markers could not be repeated in different labs. The markers confirmed by SYBRgreen always could not be confirmed by another group in Taqman. Different reverse-transcription quantitative PCR methods might be the major cause of that. To seek out the influences of different reverse-transcription quantitative PCR methods on the expression of miRNA, we chose three miRNAs which showed conflicted or consistent results in different RT-qPCR methods according to previous studies, including miR-412-3p, miR-124a-3p, miR-10b-5p, for menstrual blood, vaginal secretions and semen respectively. MiRNAs were analyzed through Taqman and SYBRgreen according to the protocols respectively. Different ΔCq values of the same miRNA marker were detected by SYBRgreen and Taqman. Different results can be attributed to the sensitivity and specificity of two reverse-transcription quantitative methods. The choice of appropriate reverse-transcription quantitative method should be based on the study targets and the conditions of samples.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?