The Two Modes Of Language Influencing Cultural Spirit

chen baoya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/csp1097-1467320371

2001-01-01

Contemporary Chinese Thought

Abstract:The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis asserts that people who organize their experience with the help of different languages can have different pictures of the world.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The Difference Between Modes of Thinking and Its Influence on Language Communications

窦卫霖

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-6522.2004.04.010

2004-01-01

Abstract:Cross-cultural communication is influenced by many cultural factors such as culture, thinking, language and mode of communication, especially by mode of thinking. While Eastern thinking features wholeness, intuition, specification and inducing, Western thinking features analysis, logicalness, abstraction and deduction. It is very important for Chinese students to develop multi-modes of thinking in their language learning and language communication.
The Non-equivalence of Language-Value between Chinese and American Cultures Based on the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

Liu Yang,Luo Shan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36348/sijll.2022.v05i05.006

2022-05-21

Scholars International Journal of Linguistics and Literature

Abstract:The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis advocates the ontology of language, arguing that language affects and even determines human thinking to some extent. In view of the fact that human thinking is abstract and intangible, and that values are the soul of the way of thinking, this paper compares the three sets of non-equivalent phenomena between Chinese and American languages and values. As a result, it can be exemplified that language cannot determine or influence values to a certain extent, that is, language cannot determine or influence people's thinking to a certain extent, thus revealing the irrationality of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis. Through in-depth analysis of the differences between Chinese and American values as well as language characteristics, the cultural concepts behind language can be more deeply understood, which is conducive to improving the awareness of cross-cultural communication and enhancing cross-cultural communication ability; on the other hand, the accuracy and authenticity of language selection can also be improved so as to ensure the reliability in the translation practice.
Interaction Between Language and Culture: Anglo-Chinese Concept of Space-time in the View of Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

WANG Yigao

2009-01-01

Journal of International Communication

Abstract:With the introduction and interpretation of the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis,and comparisons between Chinese and English vocabularies and grammars,this article tries to discuss the different Concepts of Space-time in Chinese and English.It also discusses some issues of Cross-Culture Communication.
Does Language Affect Personality Perception? A Functional Approach to Testing the Whorfian Hypothesis

Sylvia Xiaohua Chen,Verónica Benet‐Martínez,Jacky C. K. Ng,Verónica Benet-Martínez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12040

IF: 5.429

2013-06-24

Journal of Personality

Abstract:Whether language shapes cognition has long been a controversial issue. The present research adopts a functional approach to examining the effects of language use on personality perception and dialectical thinking. We propose that language use activates corresponding cultural mindsets, which in turn influence social perception, thinking, and behavior. Four studies recruited Chinese-English bilinguals (N = 129 in Study 1, 229 in Study 2, 68 in Study 3, 106 in Study 4) and used within-subjects and between-subjects design, written and behavioral reports, and self- and other perceptions. The four studies converged to show that Chinese-English bilinguals exhibit higher dialectical thinking and more variations in self- and observer ratings of personality when using the Chinese language than when using English. Furthermore, dialectical thinking predicted more self- and other-perceived variations in personality and behavior across bilingual contexts. These results highlight the important role of culture in understanding the relations between language and cognition, and attest to the malleability of personality perception and dialectical thinking within and across individuals in response to culture-related linguistic cues.

psychology, social
Mode of Thinking,Syntactic Structure,and Translation

Hongtao Yang

2008-01-01

Abstract:The mode of thinking and the form of language are in dialectical unity.The former determines the latter and latter reflects the former.English and Chinese,which belong to two entirely different language families,have vast differences in the way of expressions.The English-speaking people value the formal relationship of different parts in an entity.Such a mode of thinking determines the predominant hypotaxis feature of the English sentence structure.While the Chinese lay emphasis on the time sequence and logic in which an event evolves,resulting in the parataxis feature of the Chinese sentence structure.Study of the Chinese syntactic structure from a contrastive approach will help improve the quality of translation.
Language, Emotions, and Cultures: Emotional Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

Leonid Perlovsky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1103.2376

IF: 14.4

2011-03-11

Artificial Intelligence

Abstract:An emotional version of Sapir-Whorf hypothesis suggests that differences in language emotionalities influence differences among cultures no less than conceptual differences. Conceptual contents of languages and cultures to significant extent are determined by words and their semantic differences; these could be borrowed among languages and exchanged among cultures. Emotional differences, as suggested in the paper, are related to grammar and mostly cannot be borrowed. Conceptual and emotional mechanisms of languages are considered here along with their functions in the mind and cultural evolution. A fundamental contradiction in human mind is considered: language evolution requires reduced emotionality, but "too low" emotionality makes language "irrelevant to life," disconnected from sensory-motor experience. Neural mechanisms of these processes are suggested as well as their mathematical models: the knowledge instinct, the language instinct, the dual model connecting language and cognition, dynamic logic, neural modeling fields. Mathematical results are related to cognitive science, linguistics, and psychology. Experimental evidence and theoretical arguments are discussed. Approximate equations for evolution of human minds and cultures are obtained. Their solutions identify three types of cultures: "conceptual"-pragmatic cultures, in which emotionality of language is reduced and differentiation overtakes synthesis resulting in fast evolution at the price of uncertainty of values, self doubts, and internal crises; "traditional-emotional" cultures where differentiation lags behind synthesis, resulting in cultural stability at the price of stagnation; and "multi-cultural" societies combining fast cultural evolution and stability. Unsolved problems and future theoretical and experimental directions are discussed.
The Language Origin of the Thinking Differences Between Chinese and English

Xinyu Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/18/20231110

2023-12-07

Abstract:Language is not merely a tool for communication; it is intricately intertwined with thinking and culture, perpetually evolving under their profound influence. Linguists widely acknowledge that language acts as a reflection of peoples worldview, unveiling diverse modes of thinking, cultural values, and perspectives. The objective of this paper is to delve into the disparities between the English and Chinese languages, shedding light on how these linguistic characteristics engender four fundamental thinking distinctions: imaginal thinking versus logical thinking, linear thinking versus curved thinking, holistic thinking versus individual thinking, and subjective thinking versus objective thinking. By exploring these disparities, a deeper understanding of the intricate relationship between language and cognition can be gained. This exploration helps to comprehend how language not only shapes perception of the world but also influences thought processes and cultural perspectives. This research contributes to the broader field of linguistics and provides valuable insights into cross-cultural communication and understanding.
A study in language and cognition.

Roger W. Brown,Eric H. Lenneberg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057814

1954-07-01

The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

Abstract:"The Whorf thesis on the relationship between language and thought is found to involve the following two propositions: (a) Different linguistic communities perceive and conceive reality in different ways. (b) The language spoken in a community helps to shape the cognitive structure of the individuals speaking that language . . . . An experiment is described which investigates a part of proposition (a)––the idea that lexical differences are indicative of cognitive differences."
Spatiality and Temporality: the Fundamental Difference Between Chinese and English

Wenbin Wang,Xinmiao Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.103011

IF: 0.916

2020-01-01

Lingua

Abstract:A language represents the unique medium of how people of a nation perceive and understand the world. This study takes a diachronic perspective to trace the evolution of Chinese and English, respectively, and examines the synchronic features of the two languages that most typically demonstrate the underlying principles of linguistic encoding. It attempts to argue that in dissecting the world and in ways of thinking, Chinese seems to focus more on space and English more on time. Therefore, this study proposes that Chinese is a spatiality-dominant language, whereas English a temporality-dominant one. This fundamental difference underlies many particularities in Chinese and English in terms of their syntactic and textual structures. It is proposed that spatiality and temporality be used as overarching typological parameters to account for the enormous differences between Chinese and English. The findings of this study can provide significant insights into the nature of the distinction between the two languages. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
The Embodiment of The Differences Between Chinese And Western Thinking in Language

Danyang Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v4i2.1449

2022-08-26

International Journal of Education and Humanities

Abstract:Culture is the backbone of a country, each country has its own language style, and the way of thinking is the connotation of culture, to more comprehensive understanding of the culture from the most fundamental, only to master the most essential nature of different thinking then will have a more comprehensive understanding of different languages. This paper makes a simple analysis of the embodiment of Chinese and western thinking modes in the language by finding relevant information, browsing relevant papers and ordinary language knowledge accumulation, and concludes that different ways of thinking can more comprehensively understand the essence of the language through different ways of thinking. The cultural customs of the country always affect our way of thinking. And the thinking logic that we have formed reacts on our daily lives. For example: speaking style, behavior habits. These words and behaviors are embodied by the thinking logic formed in our hearts. Thus it can be seen that people's language characteristics reflect their thoughts and cognition. It also reflects a deeper cultural connotation. Language is the shadow of thinking, and thinking logic is the catalyst of language. Only in the thinking mode of the language can more improve the cultural communication among countries, so as to promote the common progress and development among countries.
Linguistic Relativity Influence of Cognitive Linguistics

Wei Ren

2014-01-01

Abstract:Linguistic relativity is a kind of thinking with respect to the cultural issues of language, namely one's thinking mode as the language change, along with the application and the development of linguistic relativity, the depth of the language model, driven by new thinking on the human language, realize the extensive language reform, will produce farreaching effect the thinking and behavior of human. In this paper, combined with the current application status of linguistic relativity theory, analyzes and expounds the influence of linguistic relativity on cognitive linguistics
Linguistic Relativity Unveiled: An Exploration of Language and Cognition in Second Language Acquisition

Minqi Hao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/43/20240867

2024-03-14

Abstract:In an era of rapid globalization, cultural exchange promotes a multilingual environment, thereby increasing exposure to different linguistic frameworks. This paper takes Chinese students with second language acquisition as the research object and tries to explore whether they are affected by psychological factors and environmental factors in the process of thinking and communication in their mother tongue or non-mother tongue. Based on the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, which holds that language shapes thinking, the study investigates the cognitive linguistic challenges posed by the diversity between Chinese and Western languages and the cultural specificity behind different languages for Chinese students studying abroad. Eight in-depth interviews were conducted with Chinese students who have studied and lived abroad to gain a nuanced understanding of their language background, learning process and experiences in different language environments. Qualitative textual analysis of these interviews revealed the profound impact of cultural and thinking differences on the language difficulties encountered by participants. This study also explores the psychological factors that influence the choice of thought and expression language in the second language environment. The results show that context, common language with communication partners and cultural differences play a key role in language selection among Chinese students. In addition, the study explored the feasibility of how different languages might be better suited to express specific concepts or emotions.
Language How to Affect the Thinking?

刘丽虹,张积家

2009-01-01

Abstract:Does language affect people's cognition? The paper introduced the new results about the problem that language could shape people's cognition.It mainly concluded the following aspects:different language force people to organize information by different ways,the difference of semantic representations could have some influences on conceptual representations,the abstract symbols are advantage to the development of high cognition,language make people to combine different information,and other possible mechanics.
The Influence of Cultural Backgrounds on the English and Chinese Languages

Huimin Yu

2004-01-01

Abstract:A language is inseparable from its culture. If we want to communicate in English, it's important for us to know not only the words (the literal meaning) of that language, but also the rules of using these words (pragmatic rules). This essay deals with the influence that culture has on both English and Chinese. First, it talks about the differences in words in different cultural background; then it discusses the differences in the use of words in different cultural backgrounds. Finally, it draws the conclusion that we must be aware of these differences to achieve a successful communication.
Language, Thought and Cognition: Rethinking Whorf Hypothesis

Guang SHI,Bin XIN

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-6414.2007.01.021

2007-01-01

Abstract:Whorf Hypothesis holds that language influences and even determines thought. People using different languages have different patterns of thought. In contrast, "cognition" hypothesis believes that although language and thought are closely related they are not of the same origin and have separate routes of development. In language acquisition, cognition is prior to language and thought determines language while in language use, there is thought that needn' t be expressed by language. This paper reconsiders Whorf Hypothesis on the basis of a comparison between the above contradictory theories.
On Mental Pathfinding Effects of Human Languages from a Chinese Perspective——the Space Axis and Time Axis of Humboldt's Linguistic Theory

SHEN Xiao-long

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-2338.2012.03.014

2012-01-01

Abstract:This paper points out that Humboldt's general linguistics research respects and affirms in space axis all kinds of human languages as mental concept forms of different nations,but believes in time axis different languages in different development stages in which the European languages stand in the forefront.While only the formal,precise language system can promote the development of thinking and ideas,the variety of human languages determines the diversity of thinking logic.This paper further discusses from a Chinese perspective the different languages' mental pathfinding effect,especially the cognitive function of Chinese analog logic such as governing forms through spirit,combining images through meaning,macro-integral dynamics,and space-time holography.
A Comparative Study on The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis and Quine's Holistic View of Language

Jingbai Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/1hxxgd38

2024-04-01

Abstract:The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis and Quine's holistic view of language are two of the most important philosophical theories of language in the 20th century. Despite having separate fields of study, they are conceptually and methodologically identical. Despite the two theories' extensive histories of discussion, there are few studies that compare them. In this thesis, the general framework of the two theories is described, and the coherence of the two theories is shown through comparison studies that highlight how the behaviorist and relativist tendencies of the two are similar. This coherent analysis leads to the root of the commonality of the two theories: the spirit of thoroughgoing empiricism. The comparative study of the two theories can also portray the development trend and characteristics of the philosophy of language in the 20th century, so as to have a more comprehensive understanding of the development of the philosophy of language after the "linguistic turn.".
Relationship Between Language and Thought: Linguistic Determinism, Independence, or Interaction?

Jing Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v6i5.3926

2022-05-30

Journal of Contemporary Educational Research

Abstract:The relationship between language and thought has long been a topic of great interest in the field of linguistics, especially in psycholinguistics. Herder, Humboldt, Trendelenbury, Sapir, Whorf, Gui Shichun, Lian Shuneng, and Bao Huinan are some of the well-known scholars who have conducted research on the relationship between language and thought. With regard to the relationship between language and thought, there are three main viewpoints. The first group of scholars, represented by Sapir and Whorf, supports linguistic determinism. Some scholars believe that language and thought are mutually independent. However, others believe that language and thought are inseparable. Beginning from Sapir-Whorf hypothesis and their theory of linguistic determinism and linguistic relativity, this article agrees with the influence of language over thought but refutes the extreme viewpoint of linguistic determinism from several points, proving the independence and mutual influence of language and thought. This article finally concludes that the preferred relationship between language and thought should be that they are independent but interactive.
The Hypothesis of Linguistic Reality: New Evidence and View

Zhang Jijia,Liu Lihong,Tan Lihai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-9484.2005.03.004

2005-01-01

Abstract:The relations among Language,cognition and brain are a core issue of cognitive psychology and cognitive neuroscience. In the 1950s,B.L.Whorf,an America linguist,put forward the theory of linguistic reality to clarify the relation between language and cognition. This hypothesis irritated a large number of researches,stimulated widespread debates,and led to many important finds. But this hypothesis can not summarize the finds of cognitive psychology and cognitive neuroscience in recent years,requires further elaborating and breakthrough of the former theory frame. In this paper,the authors extend the theory of linguistic reality and claim that language is a medium or an instrument of understanding the world by humanbeings.Language may affect the styles,processes,strategies,difficulties and results of cognition. Language shapes humanbeings’ brain also,and the shaped brain may further affect language and cognition in turn.
Rethinking Language-Thought Relationship—interpreting Benjamin Lee Whorf's Language,Thought,and Reality

Yingchong Wang

2011-01-01

Abstract:The touches the core issue of language-thought relationship,and this paper attempts to lay bare Benjamin Lee Whorf's view based on his Language,Thought,and Reality(1956).The current author first points out the faults and weaknesses in Whorf's theorization:(1) shaky,second-hand data;(2) tautological argumentation due to a failure in finding a link between linguistic and nonlinguistic behaviors;and(3) the confusion of concurrence and correlation with causation.Then this paper clarifies the misunderstandings of the Whorf Hypothesis by subsequent researchers:(1) the ungrounded division of strong version and weak version;and(2) the misconception that linguistic patterns determine creative thinking,instead of what Whorf believes to be thinking.The paper observes that the Hypothesis draws people's attention to minority languages,showing a resistance to the long-standing Indo-European-centricity.It argues that different communities' linguistic forms are not mere tools for expressing the same idea,but shapes their habitual way of thinking and categorizing the world.This view on language-thought relationship puts the relatively isolated linguistic studies into a larger context of socio-cultural development.

The Two Modes Of Language Influencing Cultural Spirit

The Difference Between Modes of Thinking and Its Influence on Language Communications

The Non-equivalence of Language-Value between Chinese and American Cultures Based on the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

Interaction Between Language and Culture: Anglo-Chinese Concept of Space-time in the View of Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

Does Language Affect Personality Perception? A Functional Approach to Testing the Whorfian Hypothesis

Mode of Thinking,Syntactic Structure,and Translation

Language, Emotions, and Cultures: Emotional Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

The Language Origin of the Thinking Differences Between Chinese and English

A study in language and cognition.

Spatiality and Temporality: the Fundamental Difference Between Chinese and English

The Embodiment of The Differences Between Chinese And Western Thinking in Language

Linguistic Relativity Influence of Cognitive Linguistics

Linguistic Relativity Unveiled: An Exploration of Language and Cognition in Second Language Acquisition

Language How to Affect the Thinking?

The Influence of Cultural Backgrounds on the English and Chinese Languages

Language, Thought and Cognition: Rethinking Whorf Hypothesis

On Mental Pathfinding Effects of Human Languages from a Chinese Perspective——the Space Axis and Time Axis of Humboldt's Linguistic Theory

A Comparative Study on The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis and Quine's Holistic View of Language

Relationship Between Language and Thought: Linguistic Determinism, Independence, or Interaction?

The Hypothesis of Linguistic Reality: New Evidence and View

Rethinking Language-Thought Relationship—interpreting Benjamin Lee Whorf's Language,Thought,and Reality