Abstract:Computer vision technologies have been applied to an increasingly wide range of applications from autonomous car navigation, to medical image analysis, to precision agriculture. Despite many of these exciting innovations, recent studies reveal a number of risks in using existing computer vision systems, suggesting results of such systems may be unfair or untrustworthy. For example, major commercial facial analysis tools were shown to have substantial accuracy disparities for people of different gender or with different skin colors (Buolamwini and Gebru 2018). Visual semantic role labeling models were found to exhibit societal biases and stereotypes (Zhao et al. 2017) such as frequently associating certain activity labels with specific gender (e.g., associate “cooking” with woman). Even worse, seemly accurate image classifiers may in fact made the predictions by picking up spurious correlations between objects and irrelevant background information rather than identifying meaningful features of the objects (Ribeiro, Singh, and Guestrin 2016). Many of the risks embedded in modern computer vision systems can be attributed to the use of a training dataset that is biased. Indeed, the computer vision community has long recognized that many visual datasets present varying degrees of build-in bias due to factors such as photographic style of photographers and selection from dataset curators (Torralba, Efros, and others 2011). Using these biased datasets to train machine learning models for addressing different computer vision tasks naturally leads to the phenomenon of “bias in, bias out” and results in undesirable performance. Thus, to mitigate the fairness, accountability, and transparency concerns in computer vision, a crucial step is to start the entire pipeline with high-quality visual datasets that, at least, are authentic representations of the visual world. In other words, being able to detect potential biases hidden in the datasets prior to model development is a key step in guarding against unfair or untrustworthy outcomes in computer vision. While a few techniques have been developed to automatically detect dataset biases (Tramer et al. 2017), the nonstructured nature of visual data makes bias discovery in image datasets particularly challenging. This is because no human-comprehensive attributes can be directly leveraged

Representativeness and Diversity in Photos via Crowd-Sourced Media Analysis

Crowdsourcing Detection of Sampling Biases in Image Datasets

Knowing a tree from the forest: art image retrieval using a society of profiles.

Discovering Biases in Image Datasets with the Crowd

Retrieving Relevant and Diverse Image from Social Media Images.

Social-Sensed Image Search.

Data Coverage for Detecting Representation Bias in Image Datasets: A Crowdsourcing Approach

Community-Aware Photo Quality Evaluation by Deeply Encoding Human Perception

Exploiting Visual-based Intent Classification for Diverse Social Image Retrieval.

Analyzing social media with crowdsourcing in Crowd4SDG

Improving Fairness in Large-Scale Object Recognition by CrowdSourced Demographic Information

POI Summarization by Aesthetics Evaluation from Crowd Source Social Media

Sampled Image Tagging and Retrieval Methods on User Generated Content

SocialRank: A Ranking Model for Web Image Retrieval in Web 2.0

Crowd-sourced Pictures Geo-localization Method Based on 3D Reconstruction

Mining Diversity on Social Media Networks

Crowd-sourced Pictures Geo-Localization Method Based on Street View Images and 3D Reconstruction

Automatically Selecting Striking Images for Social Cards

Unified Photo Enhancement by Discovering Aesthetic Communities From Flickr

Contextual Enrichment of Crowds from Mobile Phone Data through Multimodal Geo-Social Media Analysis

Facebook5k: A Novel Evaluation Resource Dataset for Cross-Media Search