Abstract:Computer vision technologies have been applied to an increasingly wide range of applications from autonomous car navigation, to medical image analysis, to precision agriculture. Despite many of these exciting innovations, recent studies reveal a number of risks in using existing computer vision systems, suggesting results of such systems may be unfair or untrustworthy. For example, major commercial facial analysis tools were shown to have substantial accuracy disparities for people of different gender or with different skin colors (Buolamwini and Gebru 2018). Visual semantic role labeling models were found to exhibit societal biases and stereotypes (Zhao et al. 2017) such as frequently associating certain activity labels with specific gender (e.g., associate “cooking” with woman). Even worse, seemly accurate image classifiers may in fact made the predictions by picking up spurious correlations between objects and irrelevant background information rather than identifying meaningful features of the objects (Ribeiro, Singh, and Guestrin 2016). Many of the risks embedded in modern computer vision systems can be attributed to the use of a training dataset that is biased. Indeed, the computer vision community has long recognized that many visual datasets present varying degrees of build-in bias due to factors such as photographic style of photographers and selection from dataset curators (Torralba, Efros, and others 2011). Using these biased datasets to train machine learning models for addressing different computer vision tasks naturally leads to the phenomenon of “bias in, bias out” and results in undesirable performance. Thus, to mitigate the fairness, accountability, and transparency concerns in computer vision, a crucial step is to start the entire pipeline with high-quality visual datasets that, at least, are authentic representations of the visual world. In other words, being able to detect potential biases hidden in the datasets prior to model development is a key step in guarding against unfair or untrustworthy outcomes in computer vision. While a few techniques have been developed to automatically detect dataset biases (Tramer et al. 2017), the nonstructured nature of visual data makes bias discovery in image datasets particularly challenging. This is because no human-comprehensive attributes can be directly leveraged

Improving Fairness in Large-Scale Object Recognition by CrowdSourced Demographic Information

Discovering Biases in Image Datasets with the Crowd

Crowdsourcing Detection of Sampling Biases in Image Datasets

Fairness meets Cross-Domain Learning: a new perspective on Models and Metrics

Rethinking Bias Mitigation: Fairer Architectures Make for Fairer Face Recognition

Enhancing Fairness in Face Detection in Computer Vision Systems by Demographic Bias Mitigation.

Evaluating Fairness in Large Vision-Language Models Across Diverse Demographic Attributes and Prompts

Toward Fairer Face Recognition Datasets

FACET: Fairness in Computer Vision Evaluation Benchmark

Fairness Under Cover: Evaluating the Impact of Occlusions on Demographic Bias in Facial Recognition

The Impact of Balancing Real and Synthetic Data on Accuracy and Fairness in Face Recognition

Surveying Racial Bias in Facial Recognition: Balancing Datasets and Algorithmic Enhancements

Addressing Racial Bias in Facial Emotion Recognition

FineFACE: Fair Facial Attribute Classification Leveraging Fine-grained Features

Analyzing Fairness of Computer Vision and Natural Language Processing Models

DatasetEquity: Are All Samples Created Equal? In The Quest For Equity Within Datasets

Improving Fairness using Vision-Language Driven Image Augmentation

Towards Reliable Assessments of Demographic Disparities in Multi-Label Image Classifiers

Diversity in Faces

Fairness in Deep Learning: A Survey on Vision and Language Research