Craniospinal irradiation using pencil beam Scanning: The PSI experience

Alessandra Bolsi,Claudio De Angelis,Miriam Vázquez,Dorota Siewert,Dora Correia,Nicolas Bachmann,Antony J. Lomax,Alessia Pica,Damien C. Weber
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104817
IF: 3.119
2024-10-13
Physica Medica
Abstract:Highlights • Evaluation of dosimetric and LET data for CSI plans delivered on all the CSI patients' population at PSI. • Study of potential correlation of clinical outcome of CSI treatments, including boost, with dosimetric and LET parameters. • No correlation was found between local failures and lack of plan robustness. • No high grade toxicity could be correlated with radiobiological effect of protons. Introduction We present the dosimetric evaluation of craniospinal irradiation (CSI) treatments delivered with protons at Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), with special focus on local recurrences and late toxicity outcome. Methods This study included 71 children, adolescents and young adults (c-AYA), who received or intended to receive (3 patients, pts) CSI using PBS-PT at PSI between 2004 and January 2021. The most frequent primary tumours were: medulloblastoma (42 pts), ependymoma (8 pts) and germ cell tumors (6 pts). The patients were treated prone on Gantry1 (G1; 22 pts) up to 2017, and afterwards supine on Gantry2 (G2; 49 pts). Accuracy of prone vs. supine setup was evaluated. Nine patients received CSI for local failure (LF) after a first course of local fractionated radiation therapy (RT). For 59/71 patients (excluding three patients not receiving PBS-PT CSI and nine preirradiated) CSI plans were compared considering gantry and planning technique. Detailed analysis of the full treatment (CSI and boost series) was performed for 8 patients presenting with LFs (4 of them presented also distal failure) and for selected patients presenting with late toxicity (G2 to G4) or asymptomatic radiation-induced radiological findings. Results Supine positioning resulted in lower systematic and random errors as compared to prone (0.25 mm and 0.4 mm systematic errors respectively for supine and prone; random errors in PA direction reduced from 1.8 mm for prone to 1.4 mm for supine). Conclusions LFs were not correlated with potential dose inaccuracies or lack of robustness and no correlation of toxicities to enhanced LET have been observed.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?