Abstract:Purpose: Single-isocenter linear accelerator (LINAC)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a promising treatment technique for the management of multiple brain metastases. Because of the high prescription dose and steep dose gradient, SRS plans are sensitive to geometric errors, resulting in loss of target coverage and suboptimal local tumor control. Current planning techniques rely on adding a uniform and isotropic setup margin to all gross tumor volumes (GTVs) to account for rotational uncertainties. However, this setup margin may be insufficient, since the magnitude of rotational uncertainties varies and is dependent upon the distance between a GTV and the isocenter. In this study, we designed a framework to determine the optimal isocenter of a single-isocenter SRS plan for multiple brain metastases using stochastic optimization to mitigate potential errors resulting from rotational uncertainties. Methods: Planning target volumes (PTVs), defined as GTVs plus a 1-mm margin following common SRS planning convention, were assumed to be originally treated with a prescription dose and therefore covered by the prescription isodose cloud. The dose distribution, including the prescription isodose, was considered invariant assuming small rotations throughout the study. A stochastic optimization scheme was developed to determine the location of the optimal isocenter, so that the prescription dose coverage of rotated GTVs, equivalent to the intersecting volumes between the rotated GTVs and original PTVs, was maximized for any random small rotations about the isocenter. To evaluate the coverage of GTVs, the expected V 100 % undergoing random rotations was approximated as the sample average V 100 % undergoing a predetermined number of rotations. The expected V 100 % of each individual GTV and total GTVs was then compared between the plans using the optimal isocenter and the center-of-mass (CoM), respectively. Results: Twenty-two patients previously treated for multiple brain metastases in a single institute were included in this retrospective study. Each patient was initially treated for more than three brain metastases (mean: 7.6; range: 3-15) with the average GTV volume of 0.89 cc (range: 0.03-11.78 cc). The optimal isocenter found for each patient was significantly different from the CoM, with the average Euclidean distance between the optimal isocenter and the CoM being 4.36 ± 2.59 cm. The dose coverage to GTVs was also significantly improved (paired t-test; p < 0.001) when the optimal isocenter was used, with the average V 100 % of total GTVs increasing from 87.1% (standard deviation as std: 11.7%; range: 39.9-98.2%) to 94.2% (std: 5.4%; range: 77.7-99.4%). The volume of a GTV was positively correlated with the expected V 100 % regardless of the isocenter used (Spearman coefficient: ρ = 0.66 ; p < 0.001). The distance between a GTV and the isocenter was negatively correlated with the expected V 100 % when the CoM was used ( ρ = - 0.21 ; p = 0.004), however no significant correlation was found when the optimal isocenter was used ( ρ = - 0.11 ; p = 0.137). Conclusion: The proposed framework provides an effective approach to determine the optimal isocenter of single-isocenter LINAC-based SRS plans for multiple brain metastases. The implementation of the optimal isocenter results in SRS plans with consistently higher target coverage despite potential rotational uncertainties, and therefore significantly improves SRS plan robustness against random rotational uncertainties.

Robustness of a New Gradient Match Method in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy of Craniospinal Irradiation (CSI) Using Independent Isocenter Setup

A Script-Based Automatic Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning Method with Robust Optimization for Craniospinal Irradiation.

Robust Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plan Can Eliminate Junction Shifts for Craniospinal Irradiation

Including robustness in multi-criteria optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy

Proton PBS Planning Techniques, Robustness Evaluation, and OAR Sparing for the Whole-Brain Part of Craniospinal Axis Irradiation

SU‐F‐T‐205: Effectiveness of Robust Treatment Planning to Account for Inter‐ Fractional Variation in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Head Neck Cancer

Dosimetry and efficiency comparison of knowledge-based and manual planning using volumetric modulated arc therapy for craniospinal irradiation

Robust Optimization for Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy with Soft Spot Sensitivity Regularization

Dosimetric benefits of robust treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy for base-of-skull cancers.

Plan quality and robustness in field junction region for craniospinal irradiation with VMAT

A novel fast robust optimization algorithm for intensity-modulated proton therapy with minimum monitor unit constraint

A simple approach of three-isocenter IMRT planning for craniospinal irradiation

Optimization of treatment isocenter location in single-isocenter LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery for management of multiple brain metastases

Robust Optimization in Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy to Account for Anatomy Changes in Lung Cancer Patients

Reducing the dosimetric impact of positional errors in field junctions for craniospinal irradiation using VMAT

A Randomized Singular Value Decomposition Based Linear Programming Technique for Robotic Radiation Therapy Treatment Plan Optimization

SU‐E‐T‐175: Clinical Evaluations of Monte Carlo‐Based Inverse Treatment Plan Optimization for Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy

Effectiveness of Robust Optimization in Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Planning for Head and Neck Cancers

Preliminary Evaluation of Multifield and Single-Field Optimization for the Treatment Planning of Spot-Scanning Proton Therapy of Head and Neck Cancer

SU-FF-T-591: Improvement of IMRT Plan Quality with Non-Isocentric Beam Arrangement for Head and Neck Cancers

Commissioning of Optical Surface Imaging Systems for Cranial Frameless Stereotactic Radiosurgery