Abstract:Hunger occurs in all locations around the globe, from developing to developed countries. In fact, there were over 37 million food insecure individuals (those without access to consistent nutritious food) in the United States in 2018, and this number increased in recent years due to the COVID pandemic. In many countries, food banks are used to consolidate food donations from individuals or government agencies and then provide that food to local partner agencies (such as food pantries and soup kitchens), who distribute it to food insecure individuals. As nonprofit humanitarian organizations, food banks strive to achieve geographic equity in their food distribution, so one area (or county) is not favored over others. However, food banks also want to maximize food distribution with their limited budgets. This equitable distribution versus cost balancing act is made even more challenging since food banks experience extreme variability in both the supply (donations) of food and partner agencies' capacity to deliver food to the food insecure. Our paper focuses on how mobile pantry programs, additional food bank storage capacity, and improved partner agency capacity can be utilized to address this supply and distribution capacity variability while considering food expiration times. Mobile pantry programs allow food banks to distribute food directly to the food insecure by sending their own trucks and employees to locations where food is most needed. Although all three of these approaches can be helpful, our results show that mobile pantries are a more effective approach to achieve high equity levels. This is especially true in the case of produce with relatively short expiration times. We also find that utilizing mobile pantry programs can increase equitable partner agency distribution considerably, because even small amounts of mobile pantry distribution in under‐served areas allow for more equitable partner agency distribution in areas with available partner agency distribution capacity. Our research is based on data from our partner food bank, but our modeling and extensive sensitivity analysis should be applicable to many food banks with a similar collection and distribution structure.

On the equity-efficiency trade-off in food-bank network operations

On Fairness and Efficiency in Nonprofit Operations: Dynamic Resource Allocations

An relief resource allocation model with equity constraints

A Markov decision process model for equitable distribution of supplies under uncertainty

Food Redistribution as Optimization

Inequity Measures in Relief Resource Allocation Model

Achieving equitable food security: How can food bank mobile pantries fill this humanitarian need

A new approach for fair efficiency decomposition in two-stage structure system

Measuring and Achieving Equity in Multiperiod Emergency Material Allocation.

Cross-efficiency Evaluation in Data Envelopment Analysis Based on the Perspective of Fairness Utility.

Trade-offs between Group Fairness Metrics in Societal Resource Allocation

Utility-based Two-Stage Models with Fairness Concern

Automating Food Drop: The Power of Two Choices for Dynamic and Fair Food Allocation

Efficiency Improvement and Balance in Fixed Cost Allocation: A Trade-off Approach Based on DEA.

A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach for Assessing Fairness in Resource Allocation: Application to Kidney Exchange Programs

Trading-off price for data quality to achieve fair online allocation

Improving Food Bank Gleaning Operations: An Application in New York State

Fair Healthcare Rationing to Maximize Dynamic Utilities

Randomized Assignments for Barter Exchanges: Fairness vs. Efficiency.

A Non-Parametric Approach-Based Trade-Off between Food System Efficiency and Robustness

Where to Build Food Banks and Pantries: A Two-Level Machine Learning Approach