Two Approaches for Treating Upper Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis with Neurological Deficits in the Elderly: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

Zheng Liu,Xiyang Wang,Zhengquan Xu,Hao Zeng,Penghui Zhang,Wei Peng,Yupeng Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.01.002
IF: 1.885
2016-01-01
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Abstract:Objective: The current study compared clinical outcomes of two diverse therapeutic strategies for upper thoracic (T1-4) spinal tuberculosis with neurological deficits in elderly patients.Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 18 cases undergoing single-stage posterior transpedicular decompression, debridement, interbody fusion, and instrumentation (Group A). Sixteen cases underwent single- or two-stage anterior debridement, bone grafting, and posterior instrumentation (Group B). The clinical and radiographic results for these patients were analyzed and compared.Results: Patients were followed up for an average of 40.9 +/- 4.0 months (range 36-48 months). Results demonstrated that the average operative duration, blood loss, hospital stays, and operative complication rate were lesser for Group A than for Group B. The average fusion time was 8.1 +/- 1.5 months and 7.8 +/- 2.9 months in Groups A and B, respectively (p > 0.05). Cobb's angles were significantly corrected after surgical management, but loss of correction occurred in both groups. All patients had significant postoperative neurological improvement.Conclusions: Single-stage posterior transpedicular debridement, decompression, interbody fusion and instrumentation might be a better surgical treatment compared with combined posterior and anterior approaches. Such techniques may result in fewer complications and a better quality of life for elderly patients. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?