Abstract:BACKGROUND: There is a high prevalence of spinal tuberculosis in developing countries. Beside systematic chemotherapy, there are still some patients who need surgical treatment at certain phase of systematic treatment.However, there is no standard method for surgical treatment of spinal tuberculosis yet.OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the effect of anterior approach and posterior approach through consulting the literatures on the comparison between anterior approach and posterior approach for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis.METHODS: The PubMed database, Medline database, Elseveir database, Wanfang database and CNKIdatabase were searched with the key words of "thoracolumbar tuberculosis, controlled randomized trial, RCT, anterior,posterior" in Chinese and English. The randomized controlled trials on the comparison between anterior approach and posterior approach for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis were included. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss,correction degree of Cobb angle, loss of Cobb angle at final follow-up, allograft fusion time, total hospital stay and the excellent and good rate of the effectiveness were compared by Revman5.1 software.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 1 438 articles were screened out, and finally 9 randomized controlled trials were included. The total number of patients was 692, in which 324 were treated with anterior approach and 368 were treated with posterior approach. The operative time of anterior approach of 46.25(40.23, 52.26) minutes was less than that of posterior approach; the intraoperative blood loss of anterior approach of 148.91(135.12, 1 625.70) mL less than that of posterior approach; the correct degree of Cobb angle of anterior approach of 2.40°(2.21°, 4.62°) was smaller than that of posterior approach; the loss of Cobb angle of anterior approach of 0.66°(0.41°, 0.91°) was larger than that of posterior approach; the total hospital stay of anterior approach of 0.34(-0.32,1.01) days was less than that of posterior approach; the allograft fusion time of anterior approach was less than that of posterior approach for 0.26(0.18, 0.34)months; the number of cases with excellent and good effect of anterior approach was more than that of posterior approach for 1.18(-0.48, 2.85); there were significant differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, correct degree of Cobb angle, loss of Cobb angle at final follow-up and allograft fusion time between anterior and posterior approaches(P < 0.01). The results showed that there were significant differences in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, correct degree of Cobb angle, loss of Cobb angle at final follow-up and allograft fusion time between anterior and posterior approaches for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis, but there were no significant differences in total hospital stay and surgical efficacy.

Posterior-Only Versus Combined Posterior-Anterior Approaches For Thoracolumbar Spinal Tuberculosis With Neurological Deficit In The Elderly

Posterior debridement and internal fixation for ultralong segmental tuberculosis in thoracic and lumbar vertebra through cross-window

Anterior versus posterior procedure for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis: A retrospective analysis

Clinical efficacy of different surgical approaches in the treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis: a multicenter retrospective case–control study with a minimum 10-year follow-up

Thoracoscopic anterior approach decompression and reconstruction for thoracolumbar spine diseases]

Clinical Efficacy of Different Surgical Approaches in Treatment of Thoracolumbar Tuberculosis in Tibet

Comparison of single posterior debridement, bone grafting and instrumentation with single-stage anterior debridement, bone grafting and posterior instrumentation in the treatment of thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis

Transforaminal Debridement with a Posterior-Only Approach Involving Placement of an Interbody Bone Graft Combined with Diseased Vertebral Fixation for the Treatment of Thoracic and Lumbar Tuberculosis

Efficacy of Surgery Via the Single Anterior and Single Posterior Approaches for Treatment of Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis.

Efficacy Analysis of One-Stage Posterior-Only Surgical Treatment for Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis in the T4–6 Segments with Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up

Single Posterior Surgical Management for Lumbosacral Tuberculosis

Comparison of Anterior, Posterior, and Anterior Combined with Posterior Surgical Treatment of Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis: a Systematic Review

Anterior approach versus posterior approach for thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis fracture: A Meta-analysis

Clinical study on treatment of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis through one-stage anterolateral-posterior approach

[Anterior Instrumentation for the Treatment of Tuberculotic Spinal Deformity].

[Surgical Treatment for Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis with Intraspinal Abscesses by Unilateral Vertebral Lamina Limited Decompression Via Posterior-Only Approach].

Anterior Versus Posterior Surgical Approach for Lumbosacral Tuberculosis

Comparative study of two different surgical procedures for lumbosacral tuberculosis

One Stage Combined Anterior and Posterior Surgeries for Multi-Segemental Thoracolumbar Tuberculosis

Clinical effect of posterior-only approach debridement, intervertebral fusion, and internal fixation for upper thoracic tuberculosis