Abstract:The performance of solid composite electrodes is closely tied to their microstructure, which governs both ionic and electronic conduction. Emerging cathode materials are sometimes softer than solid electrolytes, leading to formation of unfavorable microstructures. By strategically 'softening' solid electrolytes and 'hardening' redox materials, the relative hardness between electrolyte, and active material can be reversed, promoting the formation of favorable microstructure. All‐solid‐state batteries hold great promise for achieving high energy densities. Fabrication of solid‐state electrodes involves cold compaction of the active material—typically an oxide—with a sulfide electrolyte, during which the softer sulfide particles deform and enwrap the harder oxide particles to afford an "active material‐in‐electrolyte" microstructure where the electrolyte forms a continuous ion‐conducting network. This mechanism however does not apply to emerging active materials that promise even higher energy densities like organic and sulfur‐based compounds. These materials are softer than sulfides and form unfavorable "electrolyte‐in‐active material" microstructures where ionic conduction is interrupted. Improvement of these electrodes is challenging in the absence of strategies to overcome the intrinsic material hardnesses. Here, it is demonstrated how the relative hardness difference can be reversed by simultaneously "softening" a sulfide electrolyte Li6PS5Cl by solvent treatment and "hardening" an organic material pyrene‐4,5,9,10‐tetraone (PTO) through partial lithiation. The lithiated PTO ends up harder than the treated Li6PS5Cl, thus forming the favorable "active material‐in‐electrolyte" microstructure. Cell performance improved as a result, including a 91% increase in material utilization compared with electrodes with unfavorable microstructures, as well as enhanced discharge−charge rates and cycling stability. Such a hardness manipulation strategy has broad applications in solid‐state devices and energy storage.

Manipulating Hardness to Construct Favorable Electrode Microstructures for All‐Solid‐State Batteries (Adv. Energy Mater. 42/2024)

Manipulating Hardness to Construct Favorable Electrode Microstructures for All‐Solid‐State Batteries

Microstructure Design of Electrolytes for High-Energy-Density Aqueous Batteries

A Dynamically Stable Sulfide Electrolyte Architecture for High-Performance All-Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries

Tailoring the Chemical/Electrochemical Response in a Quasi−Solid Polymer Electrolyte Enables the Simultaneous In Situ Construction of Superior Cathodic and Anodic Interfaces (Adv. Energy Mater. 22/2024)

Design of a Teflon‐Like Anion for Unprecedently Enhanced Lithium Metal Polymer Batteries (Adv. Energy Mater. 15/2023)

Molecular Engineering toward Robust Solid Electrolyte Interphase for Lithium Metal Batteries (Adv. Mater. 14/2024)

Optimized Interfaces in Anti-Perovskite Electrolyte-Based Solid-State Lithium Metal Batteries for Enhanced Performance

Protected Lithium‐Metal Anodes in Batteries: From Liquid to Solid

Tuning Ion/Electron Conducting Properties at Electrified Interfaces for Practical All‐Solid‐State Li–Metal Batteries

Supramolecular Salt‐Assisted Quasi‐Solid‐State Electrolyte Promoting Dual Conductive Interface for High‐Energy‐Density Lithium Metal Batteries (Adv. Energy Mater. 4/2024)

Enabling ultrafast ionic conductivity in Br-based lithium argyrodite electrolytes for solid-state batteries with different anodes

Chemomechanical Pairing of Alloy Anodes and Solid-State Electrolytes

The Influence of Organic-Inorganic Composite Solid Electrolytes on Electrochemical Performance in Solid-State Lithium Batteries

Cathode Structural Design Enabling Interconnected Ionic/electronic Transport Channels for High-Performance Solid-State Lithium Batteries

A 3D Cross‐Linking Lithiophilic and Electronically Insulating Interfacial Engineering for Garnet‐Type Solid‐State Lithium Batteries

Energy Storage: Advances in Interfaces Between Li Metal Anode and Electrolyte (adv. Mater. Interfaces 2/2018)

All‐Solid‐State Batteries: Nano‐Scale Complexions Facilitate Li Dendrite‐Free Operation in LATP Solid‐State Electrolyte (Adv. Energy Mater. 26/2021)

Rational Design of an Electron/Ion Dual-Conductive Cathode Framework for High-Performance All-Solid-State Lithium Batteries.

Lithium‐Ion Batteries: Flexible Composite Solid Electrolyte Facilitating Highly Stable “soft Contacting” Li–Electrolyte Interface for Solid State Lithium‐Ion Batteries (adv. Energy Mater. 22/2017)

Drawing a Soft Interface: An Effective Interfacial Modification Strategy for Garnet-Type Solid-State Li Batteries