Abstract:We previously reported a negative, non-location-specific aftereffect of apparent motion (AM) adaptation. For example, perceived AM direction of a bistable motion quartet stimulus spanning a small area (~4×4 deg) exhibited a horizontal bias after 75 seconds of adaptation to a vertically directed AM adaptation stimulation spanning a large area (~8×8 deg). We now further investigated the characteristics of such an AM adaptation phenomenon as a function of adaptation duration (3, 5, 8,10, 12, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 75 seconds). The adapting AM stimulus (~8×8 deg; motion token diameter=1 deg; frame duration=200 msec; ISI=0) was rendered to move back-and-forth horizontally or vertically. The AM test stimulus (~4×4 deg; motion token diameter=1 deg; frame duration=150 msec; ISI=0) was displayed for 15 seconds and the observer was to continuously report the perceived motion direction by holding down on selected keys. Overall, we found a positive AM aftereffect with short adaptation durations (3 and 5 seconds), which switched to a negative AM aftereffect with adaptation durations beyond 8 second. Further analysis of the perceived AM direction immediately upon termination of the AM adaptation revealed a relationship between the immediately-perceived AM duration (AMimmediate_percept) and AM adaptation duration (Durationadaptation), where AMimmediate_percept = 8.286*log(Durationadaptation) - 6.607. Notably, AMimmediate_percept became zero when Durationadaptation was 6.3 sec, revealing a critical adaptation duration, Durationcritical_adaptation. Therefore, when Durationadaptation > Durationcritical_adaptation, the AM aftereffect was negative whereas it was positive when Durationadaptation < Durationcritical_adaptation. Interestingly, the latter reveals an AM priming effect. Of significance, these findings suggest stimulus-driven attention-shift by itself is a driver of AM perception. Specifically, short duration of AM stimulation in one direction (horizontal or vertical) facilitates the stimulus-driven attention-shift mechanism in the same direction. Conversely, a longer AM stimulation duration fatigues the stimulus-driven attention-shift mechanism. This consequently biases the perceived AM toward the orthogonal direction.

Habituation of Visual Adaptation.

Repeated Contrast Adaptation Does Not Cause Habituation of the Adapter

Distinct Mechanisms Control Contrast Adaptation over Different Timescales.

Visual Adaptation As a Tool of Face Perception Study

Direction Selective Habituation of Motion Adaptation

Exploring timescales of adaptation mechanisms along the visual-processing hierarchy

Visual Adaptation and Its Neural Mechanisms

Four Days of Visual Contrast Adaptation: Effects on Perceived Contrast Grow Monotonically While Effects on Orientation Rise then Fall.

Four Days of Visual Contrast Deprivation Reveals Limits of Neuronal Adaptation.

Distinct Mechanism for Long-Term Contrast Adaptation

Separate Mechanisms for Long- and Short-Term Contrast Adaptation

The Timescale of Adaptation at Early and Mid-Level Stages of Visual Processing

Spontaneous Recovery and Time Course of Biological Motion Adaptation

Selective Adaptation for Temporal Information: Evidence from the Classification of Visual Ternus Apparent Motion

Spontaneous Recovery of Effects of Contrast Adaptation Without Awareness

Orientation-selective adaptation improves perceptual grouping

Visual adaptation and face perception

Adaptation Effects That Gain Strength over 8 Hour Induction Periods

Spontaneous Recovery of Motion and Face Aftereffects

Adaptation optimizes sensory encoding of future stimuli

Aftereffects of apparent motion adaptation depends on adaptation duration