Abstract:We previously reported a negative, non-location-specific aftereffect of apparent motion (AM) adaptation. For example, perceived AM direction of a bistable motion quartet stimulus spanning a small area (~4×4 deg) exhibited a horizontal bias after 75 seconds of adaptation to a vertically directed AM adaptation stimulation spanning a large area (~8×8 deg). We now further investigated the characteristics of such an AM adaptation phenomenon as a function of adaptation duration (3, 5, 8,10, 12, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 75 seconds). The adapting AM stimulus (~8×8 deg; motion token diameter=1 deg; frame duration=200 msec; ISI=0) was rendered to move back-and-forth horizontally or vertically. The AM test stimulus (~4×4 deg; motion token diameter=1 deg; frame duration=150 msec; ISI=0) was displayed for 15 seconds and the observer was to continuously report the perceived motion direction by holding down on selected keys. Overall, we found a positive AM aftereffect with short adaptation durations (3 and 5 seconds), which switched to a negative AM aftereffect with adaptation durations beyond 8 second. Further analysis of the perceived AM direction immediately upon termination of the AM adaptation revealed a relationship between the immediately-perceived AM duration (AMimmediate_percept) and AM adaptation duration (Durationadaptation), where AMimmediate_percept = 8.286*log(Durationadaptation) - 6.607. Notably, AMimmediate_percept became zero when Durationadaptation was 6.3 sec, revealing a critical adaptation duration, Durationcritical_adaptation. Therefore, when Durationadaptation > Durationcritical_adaptation, the AM aftereffect was negative whereas it was positive when Durationadaptation < Durationcritical_adaptation. Interestingly, the latter reveals an AM priming effect. Of significance, these findings suggest stimulus-driven attention-shift by itself is a driver of AM perception. Specifically, short duration of AM stimulation in one direction (horizontal or vertical) facilitates the stimulus-driven attention-shift mechanism in the same direction. Conversely, a longer AM stimulation duration fatigues the stimulus-driven attention-shift mechanism. This consequently biases the perceived AM toward the orthogonal direction.

Selective Adaptation for Temporal Information: Evidence from the Classification of Visual Ternus Apparent Motion

Adaptation to Temporal Interval Modulates the Perception of Visual Apparent Motion

Adaptation to Visual or Auditory Time Intervals Modulates the Perception of Visual Apparent Motion

Crossmodal Statistical Binding of Temporal Information and Stimuli Properties Recalibrates Perception of Visual Apparent Motion.

Temporal Reference, Attentional Modulation, and Crossmodal Assimilation

Auditory Temporal Modulation of the Visual Ternus Effect: the Influence of Time Interval.

Influences of intra- and crossmodal grouping on visual and tactile Ternus apparent motion.

What You See Depends on What You Hear: Temporal Averaging and Crossmodal Integration

Stimulus driven attention-shift as a driver of apparent motion perception

Exploring timescales of adaptation mechanisms along the visual-processing hierarchy

Aftereffects of apparent motion adaptation depends on adaptation duration

Direction Selective Habituation of Motion Adaptation

Involuntary attention can modulate the disappearance in motion-induced blindness

The Role of Spatiotemporal and Spectral Cues in Segregating Short Sound Events: Evidence from Auditory Ternus Display

Cognitive Style Predicts the Perception of Visual Apparent Motion

Habituation of Visual Adaptation.

Distinct Mechanisms Control Contrast Adaptation over Different Timescales.

Immediate Temporal Information Modulates the Target Identification in the Attentional Blink

The Speed and Temporal Frequency of Visual Apparent Motion Modulate Auditory Duration Perception

Interaction of Perceptual Grouping and Crossmodal Temporal Capture in Tactile Apparent-Motion

Separate Mechanisms for Long- and Short-Term Contrast Adaptation