Abstract:Background: With the rising demand for minimally invasive and cosmetically appealing surgeries, transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has been increasingly adopted, albeit in a limited number of medical centers. Our team has successfully executed transumbilical SILC for benign gallbladder diseases. This study retrospectively analyzed and compared the efficacy of transumbilical SILC with that of conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). Methods: We analyzed data from 358 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed at Shanghai East Hospital of Tongji University between January 2021 and October 2023. Of these, 186 cases underwent SILC (observation group), while 172 cases underwent CLC (control group). We compared patient demographics, perioperative outcomes, and satisfaction with incision scars. Primary outcomes included surgical efficacy and safety, whereas secondary outcomes encompassed postoperative hospitalization duration, pain levels, hospital costs, and scar satisfaction. Results: No significant differences were observed in patient demographics between the two groups. Both the SILC and CLC groups exhibited similar operative times (39.56 +/- 14.55 minutes versus 41.82 +/- 16.13 minutes, P = .164) and intraoperative blood loss (11.34 +/- 3.90 mL versus 11.28 +/- 3.87 mL, P = .885). The single-incision approach led to earlier postoperative bowel function recovery (22.03 +/- 3.60 hours versus 24.17 +/- 3.22 hours, P < .01), lower 24-hour postoperative pain scores (2.06 +/- 0.84 versus 2.35 +/- 0.72, P < .01), shorter postoperative hospital stays (2.88 +/- 0.86 days versus 3.33 +/- 0.96 days, P < .01), comparable hospitalization costs (3411.67 +/- 790.86$ versus 3494.50 +/- 558.76$, P = .257), and better Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating scores (1.78 +/- 0.70 versus 2.17 +/- 0.89, P < .01). Patient satisfaction was higher with the single-incision technique (8.52 +/- 0.79 versus 7.80 +/- 0.75, P < .01). Both groups experienced one case of incision infection (SILC 0.54%, CLC 0.58%), and there was one case of postoperative bile leakage in the CLC group (0.58%). However, the difference in complications was not statistically significant (P > .05). Conclusion: Transumbilical SILC demonstrates safe and effective near-term efficacy, offering benefits such as reduced postoperative pain and improved cosmetic outcomes, which support its clinical adoption.

Single-incision Multiport Laparoscopy Versus Multichannel-Tipped Single Port Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Surgery: Outcomes and Benefits.

Comparison of conventional versus single port laparoscopy for surgical treatment of gynecological diseases: a pilot study

The learning curve of laparoscopic single-site salpingectomy with conventional laparoscopic instruments: A retrospective cohort study

Single-port versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies.

Short-Term Efficacy of Transumbilical Single-Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Transumbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Traditional Laparoscopic Instruments: a Report of Thirty-Six Cases

Laparoendoscopic Single Site Myomectomy: Without the Use of a Single Port Access Device

An analysis of the surgical outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy and multi-port laparoscopic myomectomy

Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Conventional Multi-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Tubal Pregnancy

A retrospective analysis of single-port laparoscopy in myoma management

Single-incision and Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Conventional Multi-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Treatment of Benign Ovarian Tumor

Comparative Study of Complications and Incision Esthetic Satisfaction Between Single-Port Laparoscopy and Traditional Laparoscopy in Benign Gynecological Surgery

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Evaluation of the Clinical Application of Trans-Umbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Inguinal Lymphadenectomy in Gynecology: Preliminary Experience at a Single Institution.

Laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Single-port laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy of benign adnexal masses during pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study

Efficacy of Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery Versus Multi-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Endometrial Cancer: a Retrospective Comparison Study.

Meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy comparing body image and cosmesis

The Effects of a Laparoscopy by Single-port Endoscopic Access in Benign Adnexal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Single-Port Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Initial Experience And Technical Points To Reduce Its Difficulties