Evaluation of the Clinical Application of Trans-Umbilical Single-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

JIANG Yi,LIU Zhengquan,XUN Xianghan,LI Rongli,HAN Yusong,WU Guohao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-6358.2012.04.012
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the safety and applicability of trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy(TUSPLC).Methods: A total of 56 patients with gallbladder stone or polypus were divided into two groups: TUSPLC group(n=24) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) group(n=32).The conversion rates,operation time,blood loss,length of hospital stay and rates of complications in the two groups were compared.Results: The operation time in TUSPLC group was significantly longer than that in LC group [(56.08±2.72) min vs.(18.13±0.73) min,P<0.01].There were no significant differences in conversion rates,blood loss,hospital stay and rates of complications between TUSPLC group and LC group(conversion rates: 12.5% vs.0%,P=0.07;blood loss:(18.75±1.84) mL vs.(14.84±1.26) mL,P>0.05;the length of hospital stay:(3.04±0.16) d vs.(2.66±0.12) d,P>0.05;rates of complications:4.17% vs.0%,P=0.43).The patients in TUSPLC group had less post-operation pain and showed better cosmesis than those patients in LC group.Conclusions: The safety and applicability of TUSPLC are similar to routine LC,but TUSPLC can reduce surface incision and post-operation pain and it can also improve cosmesis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?