Abstract:This paper compares tracking performances of the inverse hysteresis model-based feedforward compensator and the feedback-feedforward combined controller for the time-varying hysteresis nonlinearity of a piezoelectric-stack-actuator-driven (PSA-driven) system. Three different inverse hysteresis models, including Bouc-Wen, polynomial, and Prandtl-Ishlinskii (PI), are adopted to design feedforward compensator for the PSA-driven compliant system. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) scheme is employed to estimate model parameters of the Bouc-Wen and PI hysteresis models, respectively, whereas the least-mean-square-error based criterion is utilized in identifying the polynomial-based hysteresis model. Although solely feedforward compensation approach seems workable for systems with rate-independent hysteresis or slow tracking trajectories, large modeling errors are inevitable when fast trajectory or rate-dependent hysteresis is facing. To improve tracking performances, conventional PID control is augmented to the feedforward controllers. The resultant scheme is denoted as the feedback-feedforward combined control. To compare control performances of the solely feedforward and feedback-feedforward combined scheme, a number of experiments focusing on sinusoidal trajectories with different frequency have been implemented on the PSA-driven stage system. The results indicate that significant performance improvement can be achieved provided PID control is augmented to the solely feedforward approach. When different hysteresis models are of concerned, PI hysteresis model performs better in either feedforward or combined cases.

A Modified Prandtl–Ishlinskii Hysteresis Model for Modeling and Compensating Asymmetric Hysteresis of Piezo-Actuated Flexure-Based Systems

Hysteresis Model of Magnetostrictive Actuators and Its Numerical Realization

Modeling and Compensation for Dynamic Hysteresis of Piezoelectric Actuators Based on Lissajous Curve

A new hysteresis modeling and optimization for piezoelectric actuators based on asymmetric Prandtl-Ishlinskii model

A Digitized Representation of the Modified Prandtl–Ishlinskii Hysteresis Model for Modeling and Compensating Piezoelectric Actuator Hysteresis

Differential Model of Friction Based on Bristle Model and Phase-Transition Theory

Research on Control Method and Experiment for GMA's Precision Position Based on Predictive Model with Hysteresis

Hysteresis Compensation of Giant Magnetostrictive Actuator Based on Jiles-Atherton Model

Modeling and Compensation for Asymmetrical and Dynamic Hysteresis of Piezoelectric Actuators Using a Dynamic Delay Prandtl–Ishlinskii Model

Feedback-Assisted Feedforward Hysteresis Compensation: A Unified Approach and Applications to Piezoactuated Nanopositioners

Research on hysteresis of piezoelectric actuator

Research on Asymmetric Hysteresis Modeling and Compensation of Piezoelectric Actuators with PMPI Model

Modeling and Control of Piezoelectric Hysteresis: A Polynomial-Based Fractional Order Disturbance Compensation Approach

Modeling and Compensation of Dynamic Hysteresis with Force-Voltage Coupling for Piezoelectric Actuators

Hybrid hysteresis modeling and inverse model compensation of piezoelectric actuators

Hysteresis Compensation of a Piezoelectric-Stack-actuator-driven (Psa-Driven) System Using Inversion-Based Models and Feedback Control

Creep and Hysteresis Compensation for Nanomanipulation Using Atomic Force Microscope

Modeling Hysteresis with Inertial-Dependent Prandtl-Ishlinskii Model in Wide-Band Frequency-Operated Piezoelectric Actuator

Compensation of Hysteresis on Piezoelectric Actuators Based on Tripartite PI Model

Comprehensive compensation of dynamic hysteresis and creep for piezoelectric actuator

Hysteresis Modelling and Feedforward Control of Piezoelectric Actuator Based on Simplified Interval Type-2 Fuzzy System