Equity and justice should underpin the discourse on tipping points
Laura M. Pereira,Ignacio Gianelli,Therezah Achieng,Diva Amon,Sally Archibald,Suchinta Arif,Azucena Castro,Tapiwa Prosper Chimbadzwa,Kaera Coetzer,Tracy-Lynn Field,Odirilwe Selomane,Nadia Sitas,Nicola Stevens,Sebastian Villasante,Mohammed Armani,Duncan M. Kimuyu,Ibukun J. Adewumi,David M. Lapola,David Obura,Patricia Pinho,Felipe Roa-Clavijo,Juan Rocha,U. Rashid Sumaila
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-341-2024
IF: 5.4583
2024-04-06
Earth System Dynamics
Abstract:Radical and quick transformations towards sustainability will be fundamental to achieving a more sustainable future. However, deliberate interventions to reconfigure systems will result in winners and losers, with the potential for greater or lesser equity and justice outcomes. Positive tipping points (PTPs) have been proposed as interventions in complex systems with the aim to (a) reduce the likelihood of negative Earth system tipping points and/or (b) increase the likelihood of achieving just social foundations. However, many narratives around PTPs often do not take into account the entire spectrum of impacts the proposed alternatives could have or still rely on narratives that maintain current unsustainable behaviours and marginalize many people (i.e. do not take "b" into account). One such example is the move from petrol-based to electric vehicles. An energy transition that remains based on natural resource inputs from the Global South must be unpacked with an equity and justice lens to understand the true cost of this transition. There are two arguments why a critical engagement with these and other similar proposals needs to be made. First, the idea of transitioning through a substitution (e.g. of fuel) while maintaining the system structure (e.g. of private vehicles) may not necessarily be conceived as the kind of radical transformation being called for by global scientific bodies like the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Second, and probably more importantly, the question of positive for whom, positive where, and positive how must be considered. In this paper, we unpack these narratives using a critical decolonial view from the south and outline their implications for the concept of tipping points.
geosciences, multidisciplinary