Intercomparison of in situ measurements of ambient NH3: instrument performance and application under field conditions
Marsailidh M. Twigg,Augustinus J. C. Berkhout,Nicholas Cowan,Sabine Crunaire,Enrico Dammers,Volker Ebert,Vincent Gaudion,Marty Haaima,Christoph Häni,Lewis John,Matthew R. Jones,Bjorn Kamps,John Kentisbeer,Thomas Kupper,Sarah R. Leeson,Daiana Leuenberger,Nils O. B. Lüttschwager,Ulla Makkonen,Nicholas A. Martin,David Missler,Duncan Mounsor,Albrecht Neftel,Chad Nelson,Eiko Nemitz,Rutger Oudwater,Celine Pascale,Jean-Eudes Petit,Andrea Pogany,Nathalie Redon,Jörg Sintermann,Amy Stephens,Mark A. Sutton,Yuk S. Tang,Rens Zijlmans,Christine F. Braban,Bernhard Niederhauser
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6755-2022
IF: 4.184
2022-11-22
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Abstract:Ammonia (NH 3 ) in the atmosphere affects both the environment and human health. It is therefore increasingly recognised by policy makers as an important air pollutant that needs to be mitigated, though it still remains unregulated in many countries. In order to understand the effectiveness of abatement strategies, routine NH 3 monitoring is required. Current reference protocols, first developed in the 1990s, use daily samplers with offline analysis; however, there have been a number of technologies developed since, which may be applicable for high time resolution routine monitoring of NH 3 at ambient concentrations. The following study is a comprehensive field intercomparison held over an intensively managed grassland in southeastern Scotland using currently available methods that are reported to be suitable for routine monitoring of ambient NH 3 . In total, 13 instruments took part in the field study, including commercially available technologies, research prototype instruments, and legacy instruments. Assessments of the instruments' precision at low concentrations ( 0.75). At concentrations below 10 ppb, however, precision decreased, and instruments fell into two distinct groups, with duplicate instruments split across the two groups. It was found that duplicate instruments performed differently as a result of differences in instrument setup, inlet design, and operation of the instrument.
meteorology & atmospheric sciences