Abstract:Importance: Treatment strategies for intermediate coronary lesions guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) and intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) have shown comparable outcomes. Identifying low-risk deferred vessels to ensure the safe deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and high-risk revascularized vessels that necessitate thorough follow-up can help determine optimal treatment strategies.Objectives: To investigate outcomes according to treatment types and FFR and IVUS parameters after FFR- or IVUS-guided treatment.Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study included patients with intermediate coronary stenosis from the Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial, an investigator-initiated, prospective, open-label, multicenter randomized clinical trial that assigned patients into an IVUS-guided strategy (which recommended PCI for minimum lumen area [MLA] <= 3 mm2 or 3 mm2 to 4 mm2 with plaque burden [PB] >= 70%) or an FFR-guided strategy (which recommended PCI for FFR <= 0.80). Data were analyzed from November to December 2022.Exposures: FFR or IVUS parameters within the deferred and revascularized vessels.Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF), a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and revascularization at 2 years.Results: A total of 1619 patients (mean [SD] age, 65.1 [9.6] years; 1137 [70.2%] male) with 1753 vessels were included in analysis. In 950 vessels for which revascularization was deferred, incidence of TVF was comparable between IVUS and FFR groups (3.8% vs 4.1%; P = .72). Vessels with FFR greater than 0.92 in the FFR group and MLA greater than 4.5 mm2 or PB of 58% or less in the IVUS group were identified as low-risk deferred vessels, with a decreased risk of TVF (hazard ratio [HR], 0.25 [95% CI, 0.09-0.71]; P = .009). In 803 revascularized vessels, the incidence of TVF was comparable between IVUS and FFR groups (3.6% vs 3.7%; P = .95), which was similar in the revascularized vessels undergoing PCI optimization (4.2% vs 2.5%; P = .31). Vessels with post-PCI FFR of 0.80 or less in the FFR group or minimum stent area of 6.0 mm2 or less or with PB at stent edge greater than 58% in the IVUS group had an increased risk for TVF (HR, 7.20 [95% CI, 3.20-16.21]; P < .001).Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis, FFR- and IVUS-guided strategies showed comparable outcomes in both deferred and revascularized vessels. Binary FFR and IVUS parameters could further define low-risk deferred vessels and high-risk revascularized vessels.

Factors Influencing the Functional Significance in Intermediate Coronary Stenosis.

Effect of lesion characteristics on diagnostic performance of CT-derived fractional flow reserve: exploring the indications for application based on CT-FFR CHINA trial (Preprint)

Clinical Relevance of Functionally Insignificant Moderate Coronary Artery Stenosis Assessed by 3‐vessel Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement

[Association Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Quantitative Coronary Angiography Parameters in Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis].

Usefulness of Combined Intravascular Ultrasound Parameters to Predict Functional Significance of Coronary Artery Stenosis and Determinants of Mismatch

Usefulness of Lumen Area Parameters Determined by Intravascular Ultrasound to Predict Functional Significance of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis

Abstract 18406: Gender Influence on the Functional Significance of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis

Diagnostic Performance of Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve for Functional Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis

Diagnostic Performance of Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve for Functional Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis.

Functional Significance of Intermediate Coronary Stenosis in Patients with Single-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Comparison of Dynamic SPECT Coronary Flow Reserve with Intracoronary Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)

Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Parameters Predicting the Functional Significance of Single De Novo Lesions.

Clinical Outcomes of Deferred Lesions with Angiographically Insignificant Stenosis but Low Fractional Flow Reserve.

Optimal Intravascular Ultrasound Criteria for Defining the Functional Significance of Intermediate Coronary Stenosis: an International Multicenter Study.

Optimized Quantitative Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Parameters Predicting the Functional Significance of Single De Novo Lesions in the Left Anterior Descending Artery.

Diagnostic Performance of Computational Fluid Dynamics (Cfd)-Based Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Derived from Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography (CCTA) for Assessing Functional Severity of Coronary Lesions

Clinical Implications of Three-Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Physiology- or Imaging-Guided Strategies for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis.

Angiographic Lesion Morphology Provides Incremental Value to Generalize Quantitative Flow Ratio for Predicting Myocardial Ischemia

A systematic review of imaging anatomy in predicting functional significance of coronary stenoses determined by fractional flow reserve

Diagnostic Performance of AccuFFRangio in the Functional Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Compared with Pressure Wire-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve.

Discordance Between Angiographic Assessment and Fractional Flow Reserve or Intravascular Ultrasound in Intermediate Coronary Lesions: A Post-hoc Analysis of the FLAVOUR Trial.