Abstract:Objective To integrate urine strip chemistry analysis with urine sedimental analysis and set up the criteria for urine microscopy review following automated urine analysis.Methods A total of 1 714 urine samples were collected from Peking Union Medical College Hospital from November 2008 to October 2010.Out of 1 714 samples, 1 300 samples were used for the establishment of review criteria, and 214 samples were used for criteria verification.The other 200 samples from healthy donors were used to set up the normal reference range of fully automated urine sedimental analyzer UF-1000i.RBC,WBC,PRO and CAST in all the samples were measured by Siemens Bayer Clinitek 500 urine strip chemistry analyzer, Sysmex UF-1000i urine sedimental analyzer and microscopic examination.Based on the different laboratory automation in urine analysis, four microscopic review protocols were defined: (1) Protocol 1: based on chemistry results only, microscopy review was performed when any of WBC, RBC and PRO was positive; (2) Protocol 2: based on fully automated sedimental analyzer only,microscopy review was performed when any of WBC, RBC and CAST was over the upper limit of the reference range; (3) Protocol 3: All the results of urine chemistry analyzer and sedimental analyzer were integrated.If two WBC results were different between two systems (in one system WBC was positive or over the upper limit of the reference range but in another system WBC was negative or within the reference range), and any of RBC, PRO/CAST was positive or over the upper limit, microscopic review was performed; (4) Protocol 4: if any of WBC, RBC, PRO/CAST was different between two systems, microscopic review was performed.Review criteria were performed with Sysmex Laboman UriAccess 3.0 software.Results The reference ranges of UF-1000i parameters were RBC 0-7.5/μl (male), 0-15.9/μl (female); WBC 0-11.6/μl (male), 0-12.7/μl (female); Epithelial cell were 0-6.5/μl (male), 0-21.4/μl (female); CAST 0-1.3/μl.The results of microscopic examination revealed that positive samples were 47.46% (617/1 300) and negative samples were 52.54% (683/1 300). Among positive samples, majority showed the presence of RBC (60.13%,371/617), followed by CAST (8.43%,52/617).The false negative rates of four protocols were 8.38% (109/1 300), 4.69% (61/1 300), 0.62% (8/1 300) and 0.54% (7/1 300), respectively.The review rates were 47.85% (622/1 300), 59.38% (772/1 300), 72.85% (947/1 300) and 52.23% (679/1 300), respectively.Although there were false negative cases in protocol 4, all the patients had normal serum creatine level.In those 214 patients for verification, the false negative rate using protocol 4 was zero, the review rates were 53.74% (115/214).Conclusions Protocol 4 shows lest false negative rate and lower review rate.Importantly, there was no patients with serious renal function abnormality missed using protocol 4.Therefore, protocol 4 is an ideal criteria for microscopy review following automated urine analysis.

Establishment and development of the personalized criteria for microscopic review following multiple automated routine urinalysis systems.

Development and Clinical Application of Microscopy Review Criteria of Automated Urine Chemistry and Sedimental Analysis

Establishment of the intelligent verification criteria for a routine urinalysis analyzer in a multi-center study.

Clinical Application of UF-1000i in Combination with AX-4280 for the Screening Test Ability of Urinary Formed Elements.

Interpreting report of urinalysis based on intelligent data and machine learning

The Application Evaluation of Clinical Decision Support in Auto-verification and Interpretation of Laboratory Test Results

A multicenter research on validation and improvement of the intelligent verification criteria for routine urinalysis

Development of the Personalized Criteria for Microscopic Review Following Four Different Series of Hematology Analyzer in a Chinese Large Scale Hospital

Improving the Detection of Urine Sediment with a Modified Urinalysis Review Procedure.

Proof-of-Concept Workflow for Establishing Reference Intervals of Human Urine Proteome for Monitoring Physiological and Pathological Changes

Performance of the Sysmex UF-1000i Urine Analyser in the Rapid Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections in Hospitalized Patients.

Progress in Automated Urinalysis

Acoustofluidic-based microscopic examination for automated and point-of-care urinalysis

A novel approach to screening and managing the urinary tract infections suspected sample in the general human population

Performance evaluation and clinical application of the UA-5600 automatic dry chemistry urine analyzer in renal diseases

Evaluation of Aging and Health Status in Real Time Based on Routine Urinalysis Using an Automated Urine Analyzer

Use of artificial intelligence for tailored routine urine analyses

[Establishment and Evaluation of Review Criteria for ADVIA 120/2120 and Different Series of Hematology Analyzers].

Establishment of a candidate reference measurement procedure for the enumeration of cell particles in urine and applied to multi-center evaluation of an automated urine analyzer

Establishment of improved review criteria for hematology analyzers in cancer hospitals

Pay attention to the automated body fluid cytology analysis and quality control