Abstract:Screening of urine samples is the third most frequently performed test in clinical laboratories [1]. Urinalysis generally includes two kinds of methods: strip tests and microscopic examinations [1]. Urine microscopy, urine sediment analysis using microscope, has been used to detect various urologic diseases affecting from kidney to urinary tract [1, 2]. However, manual microscopic examination is time consuming and needs experts for interpretation [3]. The effort of examining the particles in samples has long been a big issue in the hematologic field [2]. Wallace Coulter developed a counting method for particles in electrolyte solutions [2]. It made accurate cell counts in blood and became main equipment in laboratory hematologic analysis [2]. However, Coulter method could not be easily adapted in urinalysis until the late 1990s, because urine contains the broad spectrum of particles such as crystals, and cells that do not exist in blood [2]. Fifty years after Coulter method was introduced, laboratory instrument for identifying and enumeration urine particle was finally developed [2]. In the field of automated microscopy, the process of continuous technical development and adaptation has been achieved [3]. Consequently, flow cytometry and digitized microscopy have been introduced and established for enumerating urine particles in modern laboratories. Urinary tract infection (UIT) is the most common infections in both hospitalized and community-acquired patients [4]. Many investigators have evaluated the ability of flow cytometry to detect bacteria and WBCs in urine samples [3]. Because of the high percentage of negative urine culture results, efficient screening method with a high negative predictive value (NPV) has been required for a long time [5]. Researchers have extensively investigated to show whether laser-based flow cytometry can be useful screening tests for pyuria or bacteriuria [2]. Rosa et al. [4] reported that the new Sysmex urine analyzer, UF-5000 (Sysmex cooperation, Kobe, Japan) based on laser flow cytometry, presented high NPV up to 99.7% with conventional urine culture. If flow cytometric methods reduce the number of unnecessary urine culture tests, it can also save labor, time, and cost in laboratories [3]. On the other hand, the software image analysis of the digital microscope forms another one of the two main axes of automated urine sediment examinations. Because flow cytometric methods make a scattergram not an image, laboratorian cannot discard manual microscope to verify and differentiate problematic particles in urine [2]. In contrast, automated digital microscopy based on pattern recognition produces real images that can be reviewed by experts [2, 3]. Compared with manual microscopy, it shows good performance and agreement to detect RBCs, WBCs, bacteria and squamous epithelial cells [2]. However, it is less reliable in detecting non-squamous epithelial cells, non-hyaline casts, unusual crystals and lipids [6, 7]. In this issue of Ann Lab Med, Oyaert and Delanghe [3] introduced detailed reviews on recent advances in automated urinalysis systems, including application of these two practical developments. Although their performance requires further evaluation, adaptation and integration of these new technologies in urinalysis can lead to make more accurate patients results and 1 / 1 CROSSMARK_logo_3_Test

Acoustofluidic-based microscopic examination for automated and point-of-care urinalysis

Engineering a Universal and Fully Automatic Analyzer for Multichannel and On-Site Biochemical Detection in Body Fluids

An Integrated Flexible Multi-sensing Device for Daily Urine Analysis at Home

Clinical Application of UF-1000i in Combination with AX-4280 for the Screening Test Ability of Urinary Formed Elements.

Advances in Automated Urinalysis Systems, Flow Cytometry and Digitized Microscopy

Point-of-Care Urinalysis with One Drop of Sample Using an Aggregation-Induced Emission Luminogen under the Coffee-Ring Effect

An Integrated Double-Filtration Microfluidic Device for Detection of Extracellular Vesicles from Urine for Bladder Cancer Diagnosis.

Progress in Automated Urinalysis

Development of Microscopic Review Criteria by Comparison Urine Flow Cytometer, Strip and Manual Microscopic Examination

Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing on Clinical Urine Samples by Video-Based Object Scattering Intensity Detection

Rapid Detection of Urinary Tract Infection in 10 Min by Tracking Multiple Phenotypic Features in a 30 S Large-Volume Scattering Video of Urine Microscopy

A novel approach to screening and managing the urinary tract infections suspected sample in the general human population

An Automatic Whole Blood Analyzer for Renal Function Analysis with a Centrifugal Microfluidic Device

A portable urine analyzer based on colorimetric detection

Micro-flow Cell Washing Technique Combined with Single-Cell Raman Spectroscopy for Rapid and Automatic Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test of Pathogen in Urine

Machine Learning-Assistant Colorimetric Sensor Arrays for Intelligent and Rapid Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection

Machine learning-assisted image label-free smartphone platform for rapid segmentation and robust multi-urinalysis

Development of a Quantitative Digital Urinalysis Tool for Detection of Nitrite, Protein, Creatinine, and pH

Photoacoustic-Based Miniature Device with Smartphone Readout for Point-of-Care Testing of Uric Acid

Novel Field Amplification for Sensitive Colorimetric Detection of Microalbuminuria on a Paper-Based Analytical Device

Smartphone-Assisted Colorimetry and Array Test Strip Integrated Platform for Urine Multi-Index Simultaneous Precise Quantification and Personalized Healthcare Monitoring