Abstract:There is much controversy on the psychological mechanism of Judgements of learning (JOLs). Cue-utilization approach proposed by Koriat considers that most of the cues can be grouped into three classes: intrinsic, extrinsic, and mnemonic. Both intrinsic and extrinsic cues may affect JOLs directly, and they may also exert their effect indirectly through their influence on any of the internal, mnemonic cues. The theory can explain successfully the bases or implications of JOLs from a broad perspective, but it can not state the way how individuals make JOLs. Meanwhile, some researchers proposed encoding fluency and retrieval fluency to explain and examine their effects on JOLs during leaning process, which are helpful for researchers to probe into the psychological mechanism of JOLs deeply. In addition, some research focused on children with learning disabilities (LD) found that, compared to their normal peers, lower metacognitive accuracy was one of their important characteristics. However, most of research was descriptive, and can not provide suitable targeted direction for educational practices. According to these, the present study would examine the different effects of different fluency cues on children with LD to find their specific influencial patterns. Twenty children with LD and twenty normal children selected from a common primary school (Mean age = 10.5 years) participated in the experiment to make item-by-item JOLs for paired words presented using a PC. This study examined the effects of encoding fluency (inferred from self-paced study time) and retrieval fluency (inferred from the latency of pre-JOL retrieval) on JOLs, wihch were elicited either immediately after study or after a short or longer delay. Results showed that: (1) Children with LD mainly utilized retrieval fluency to make JOL across immediate and delay conditions. However, for normal children, it showed some distinction between encoding and retrieval fluency as potential cues for JOL across immediate and delay conditions. (2)As a kind of JOLs cues, encoding fluency was more valid than retrieval fluency with immediate JOLs condition, whereas retrieval fluency validity increased with JOLs delay. Based on the above all results, normal children's JOLs are based on the flexible and adaptive utilization of different mnemonic cues according to their relative validity in predicting their final recall, whereas the cues children's with LD JOLs based on are not comparably flexible.

Influence of Cue Word Perceptual Information on Metamemory Accuracy in Judgement of Learning

Differential Neural Correlates Underlie Judgment of Learning and Subsequent Memory Performance

The Influence of Visual Mental Imagery Size on Metamemory Accuracy in Judgment of Learning.

The effect of emotional valence and font size on metacognition and memory

Perceptually fluent features of study words do not inflate judgements of learning: evidence from font size, highlights, and Sans Forgetica font type

How Much Do Metamemory Beliefs Contribute to the Font-Size Effect in Judgments of Learning?

Association and dissociation between judgments of learning and memory: A Meta-analysis of the font size effect

The Effect of Cue Labeling in Multimedia Learning: Evidence From Eye Tracking

The Influence of Task-Based Cues on Easy of Learning Judgment and its Accuracy

The contribution of metamemory beliefs to the font size effect on judgments of learning: Is word frequency a moderating factor?

The Effects of Encoding Fluency and Retrieval Fluency on Children's with Learning Disabilities Judgements of Learning

How font size affects judgments of learning: Simultaneous mediating effect of item-specific beliefs about fluency and moderating effect of beliefs about font size and memory

Neural dynamics of metacognitive monitoring: a dual-stage perspective on judgments of learning

What guides the judgment of learning: Memory or heuristics? An event-related potential study

Predicting the memorability of scene pictures: Improved accuracy through one's own experience

I remember it now, so I'll remember it later: Working memory strength guides predictions for long-term memory performance

Probing the effect of perceptual (dis)fluency on metacognitive judgments

Individual Differences in the Accuracy of Judgments of Learning Are Related to the Gray Matter Volume and Functional Connectivity of the Left Mid-Insula.

Item-specific and relational encoding are effective at reducing the illusion of competence

The Neglected Contribution of Memory Encoding in Spatial Cueing: A New Theory of Costs and Benefits.

Do changed learning goals explain why metamemory judgments reactively affect memory?