Abstract:Background/Objectives: The general use of triclosan-coated suture material (TCSM) for wound closure to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs) remains controversial. There is no conclusive evidence in the literature to support this and recommendations by professional organizations are contradictory. Therefore, the main objective of the study was to evaluate the 30-day rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) after elective open abdominal surgery using triclosan-coated versus uncoated running sutures (NCSM) for skin closure. Methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study enrolled patients scheduled for open elective abdominal surgery, intraoperatively assigned to either the use of triclosan-coated or non-coated sutures for skin closure. The follow up was 30 days after surgery to detect SSIs. Secondary endpoints were wound dehiscence and reoperation rate due to wound dehiscence within 30 days, all-cause 30-day mortality and length of hospital stay. Potential risk factors for poor wound healing were evaluated in multivariate analysis. Data were analyzed in an intention to treat analysis. Results: In total, 364 patients (171 males [47%]) were randomized, 182 in either group. Six underwent urgent reoperation prior to first visit and were excluded from analysis. In the full analysis set (FAS), 358 were analyzed. SSI within 30 days occurred in 22 [12.2%] patients in the control group compared to 32 [18%] in the study group. The risk difference was not statistically significant (5.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI) −1.6–13.2%; p = 0.128). The wound dehiscence rate within 30 days was 14 of 179 [7.8%] in the NCSM group vs. 19 of 178 [10.7%] in the TCSM group. The difference in re-operation rates due to wound dehiscence was 0 of 179 [2.8%] vs. 5 of 178 [2.8%] in either group and not statistically significant (p = 0.0706). Among all patients recruited, 8 died within 30 days after surgery. Three of them died before the first assessment of the primary endpoint on day 3 and were therefore excluded from the FAS. The 30-day mortality rate was 2 of 180 [1.1%] in the NCSM group vs. 3 of 178 [1.7%] in the TCSM group. The majority of SSIs occurred in the superficial layer of the wound in both study groups (8.9% vs. 9.6%). The median [inter quartile range (IQR)] length of hospital stay was 13 [9.0, 19.2] days in the NCSM group vs. 11 [9.0, 16.8] days in the TCSM group There was a tendency towards shorter hospitalization in the study group (0.72 days [6%]). Conclusions: Our prospective randomized controlled trial could not confirm the superiority of TCSM for skin closure after elective open abdominal surgery in terms of SSI rates in a 30-day follow up period. Therefore, based on our results, a general recommendation for its use in all surgical fields cannot be justified.

Absorbable Versus Nonabsorbable Sutures for Skin Closure: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Absorbable Versus Nonabsorbable Sutures for Skin Closure

Absorbable versus Nonabsorbable Sutures for Facial Skin Closure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical and Aesthetic Outcomes

Comparison of Nonabsorbable and Absorbable Suture in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Absorbable vs Nonabsorbable Sutures for Achilles Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Absorbable vs. non-absorbable suture: which one gives better results?

Barbed versus traditional sutures for wound closure in knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The outcome of sutured wounds compared with tissue adhesive for paediatric wound closure: A meta-analysis

Association between skin suture devices and incidence of incisional surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and network meta-analysis

Comparison between liquid skin adhesive and wound closure strip for skin closure after subcuticular suturing in single-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a single-center retrospective study in Korea

Cosmetic Effect of Antibacterial Absorbable Suture on Facial Laceration in Children

A randomized controlled study of medical suture device applied in laparoscopic surgery incision on the skin surface

Do Antibacterial Skin Sutures Reduce Surgical Site Infections After Elective Open Abdominal Surgery?—A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Single-Center Trial

Efficacy of meniscus suture absorbability on meniscus healing success rate via second-look arthroscopy after meniscal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Absorbable Versus Non-Absorbable Sutures in Open Rhinoplasty: Analysis of Columellar Scarring

Tissue Adhesive versus Skin Suture plus Waterproof Wound Dressings for Carpal Tunnel Wound Closure: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

A Novel Absorbable Stapler Provides Patient-Reported Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness Noninferior to Subcuticular Skin Closure: A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial

Comparison of the wound healing and complications of zipper type closure adhesive tape and stapler for surgical wound suture: A randomized control, single-centre, open-label trial

Effectiveness and Safety of Knotless Barbed Sutures in Cosmetic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

A Symmetric Anchor Designed Barbed Suture Versus Conventional Interrupted Sutures In Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of suture closure and staple closure on postoperative wound complications in patients undergoing knee replacement surgery: A meta‐analysis