Comparative Analysis of Siv-Specific Cellular Immune Responses Induced by Different Vaccine Platforms in Rhesus Macaques

Antonio Valentin,Katherine McKinnon,Jinyao Li,Margherita Rosati,Viraj Kulkarni,Guy R. Pilkington,Jenifer Bear,Candido Alicea,Diego A. Vargas-Inchaustegui,L. Jean Patterson,Poonam Pegu,Namal P. M. Liyanage,Shari N. Gordon,Monica Vaccari,Yichuan Wang,Alison E. Hogg,Blake Frey,Yongjun Sui,Steven G. Reed,Niranjan Y. Sardesai,Jay A. Berzofsky,Genoveffa Franchini,Marjorie Robert-Guroff,Barbara K. Felber,George N. Pavlakis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2014.09.005
IF: 10.19
2014-01-01
Clinical Immunology
Abstract:To identify the most promising vaccine candidates for combinatorial strategies, we compared five SIV vaccine platforms including recombinant canary pox virus ALVAC, replication-competent adenovirus type 5 host range mutant RepAd, DNA, modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA), peptides and protein in distinct combinations. Three regimens used viral vectors (prime or boost) and two regimens used plasmid DNA. Analysis at necropsy showed that the DNA-based vaccine regimens elicited significantly higher cellular responses against Gag and Env than any of the other vaccine platforms. The T cell responses induced by most vaccine regimens disseminated systemically into secondary lymphoid tissues (lymph nodes, spleen) and effector anatomical sites (including liver, vaginal tissue), indicative of their role in viral containment at the portal of entry. The cellular and reported humoral immune response data suggest that combination of DNA and viral vectors elicits a balanced immunity with strong and durable responses able to disseminate into relevant mucosal sites.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?