Comparative evaluation of oral and intranasal priming with replication-competent adenovirus 5 host range mutant (Ad5hr)-simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) recombinant vaccines on immunogenicity and protective efficacy against SIVmac251

Qifeng Zhou,Rachmat Hidajat,Bo Peng,David Venzon,M. Kristine Aldrich,Ersell Richardson,Eun Mi Lee,V.S. Kalyanaraman,George Grimes,V. Raúl Gómez-Román,L. Ebonita Summers,Nina Malkevich,Marjorie Robert-Guroff
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.09.017
IF: 4.169
2007-01-01
Vaccine
Abstract:Oral, replication-competent Ad-HIV vaccines are advancing to human trials. Previous evaluation of protective efficacy in non-human primates has primarily followed upper respiratory tract administrations. Here we compared sequential oral (O/O) versus intranasal/oral (I/O) priming of rhesus macaques with Ad5 host range mutant-SIV recombinants expressing SIV env/rev, gag, and nef genes followed by boosting with SIV gp120 protein. Cellular immune responses in PBMC were stronger and more frequent after I/O administration. Both groups developed mucosal immunity, including memory cells in bronchial alveolar lavage, and gut-homing receptors on PBMC. Following intrarectal SIVmac251 challenge, both groups exhibited equivalent, significant protection and robust post-challenge cellular immunity. Our results illustrate the promise of oral replication-competent Ad-recombinant vaccines. Pre-challenge PBMC ELISPOT and proliferative responses did not predict protection in the O/O group, highlighting the need for simple, non-invasive methods to reliably assess mucosal immunity.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?